I voted indifferent. I don't think that, in the absence of equality of opportunity, it's fair--which isn't necessarily unfair; indeed, if it were widely available, then I don't think it would be unfair, which isn't necessarily fair.
You didn't just win, you dominated.
I think that there's a predisposition of talented players towards the use of modifications, simply because in order to to be talented, you need to have played for a while and the more experience you have, the more likely you are to use a modification. I think that describing this phenomenon in significantly different terms boarders on correlation.
Quote from: Phobos on September 19, 2012, 04:23:31 PM
I voted yes. I can confirm this statement is a logical fallacy, and just an excuse to scorn players who don't try to impose their play standards on others. Just because someone is open to the consideration of players using a certain mod does not automatically make them dependent on it. I played in SleepKiller's 1v1 cloud city tournament, without any radar or crosshair mods (except sniper), and I managed to win. He also thought I would be too dependent on the mods and dared me to play without them, which I did. The only thing I rely on is skill and good ping. I can't speak for anyone else who votes yes but I'm willing to bet you are most likely wrong about them too.
You didn't just win, you dominated.
I think that there's a predisposition of talented players towards the use of modifications, simply because in order to to be talented, you need to have played for a while and the more experience you have, the more likely you are to use a modification. I think that describing this phenomenon in significantly different terms boarders on correlation.