Very nice map, good job with all of the details on it. I like the main part of the interior, its very well done. I also like the underwater portion of it.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
#122
Star Wars Battlefront: EA Reboots 1 and 2 / Re: SWBF EA Gameplay!
June 15, 2015, 03:28:06 PM
Today was the first time I have ever watched a game reveal live, and I have to say it was totally worth it! This game looks like one of the most amazing things that has happened to Star Wars since the release of the first Battlefront.
#123
General / Import Your Xfire Hours to EvolveHQ
June 12, 2015, 03:06:32 PM
EvolveHQ is allowing you to import your Xfire hours to their client, there is no guarantee this will work. It seems like a neat idea, I know Phobos mention Raptr doing something like this too:
https://blog.evolvehq.com/2015/06/goodbye-xfire-we-will-miss-you/
Edit: I see this has already been discussed, but incase you missed it, or was wondering how to go about it.
https://blog.evolvehq.com/2015/06/goodbye-xfire-we-will-miss-you/
Edit: I see this has already been discussed, but incase you missed it, or was wondering how to go about it.
#124
General / Re: Xfire alternatives: Pros and Cons
June 11, 2015, 02:59:33 PMQuote from: {TcF}Dr.Penguin on June 11, 2015, 12:26:00 PMWell, I own a couple of paid games on Steam, so I don't have that issue, but I have at least one friend on Steam who does.
Same problem here, Mirky.
#125
General / Re: Xfire alternatives: Pros and Cons
June 11, 2015, 12:11:30 PM
Free games don't count apparently, sorry I didn't specify that!
#126
General / Re: Xfire alternatives: Pros and Cons
June 11, 2015, 10:41:43 AM
The problem with Steam for some, is that if they don't own any Steam games they will have limited account functionality, such as being unable to join chat rooms. Its not an end of the world problem, but it can be a pain.
#128
SWBF 1 and 2 Tournaments / Re: ICW5
May 28, 2015, 08:06:45 AMQuote from: Shazam on May 28, 2015, 05:29:55 AMWhen it comes down to it, it's just harder to call a clanless admin biased towards a certain clan.While an Admin council is an admirable idea, and I think it might be helpful, but all of the Admins are still members of clans and thus that only solves part of the issue. You are going to have a hard time finding a clanless admin because most active players in this game, that have an interest in tournaments, are a part of clans for that very reason.
An admin council is an interesting idea that I think would work. We could always try it for the first week and if it's not working, revert to the old leadership structure.
#129
SWBF 1 and 2 Tournaments / Re: ICW5
May 25, 2015, 07:39:10 AM
Anyder, if your clan is going to play in the ICW you will have to follow all of the rules including name tags and the proper maintenance and posting of clan member lists.
By spying they (the admins) are referring to listening in on another clans chat, you can learn a lot by seeing what the other clan is saying.
By spying they (the admins) are referring to listening in on another clans chat, you can learn a lot by seeing what the other clan is saying.
#131
General / Re: I found something very interesting
May 24, 2015, 10:15:29 AM
Sereja converted a couple of those models, like the Imperial Shuttle. He didn't do any of the characters though.
#132
Star Wars Battlefront: EA Reboots 1 and 2 / Re: eastarwars.com
May 21, 2015, 07:57:45 AM
It's kind of funny, the CEO of EA (Andrew Wilson) is commenting on that website, unless he is a fake of course...
#133
Star Wars Battlefront: EA Reboots 1 and 2 / Re: NFO server pings
May 19, 2015, 07:53:11 PM
I followed your link and this is what it gave me. I live in Illinois, but it appears Dallas has a lower ping for me. As it is I can't currently play Battlefront online with our internet connection, as we have satellite internet. (Terrible Ping)
So don't make your (or any) decision based on my post, but maybe this information will be of some use to you.
Atlanta (Internap) 20000 Mbps 58 ms
Chicago (Internap) 30000 Mbps 65 ms
Dallas (Internap) 20000 Mbps 36 ms
Denver (Internap) 1000 Mbps 45 ms
Frankfurt (Internap) 20000 Mbps 158 ms
Los Angeles (Internap) 20000 Mbps 43 ms
New York City (Internap) 20000 Mbps 74 ms
San Jose (Internap) 10000 Mbps 43 ms
Seattle (Premium) 50000 Mbps 94 ms
So don't make your (or any) decision based on my post, but maybe this information will be of some use to you.
Atlanta (Internap) 20000 Mbps 58 ms
Chicago (Internap) 30000 Mbps 65 ms
Dallas (Internap) 20000 Mbps 36 ms
Denver (Internap) 1000 Mbps 45 ms
Frankfurt (Internap) 20000 Mbps 158 ms
Los Angeles (Internap) 20000 Mbps 43 ms
New York City (Internap) 20000 Mbps 74 ms
San Jose (Internap) 10000 Mbps 43 ms
Seattle (Premium) 50000 Mbps 94 ms
#134