Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - -=(212) Nixo=-

#106
SWBF 1 and 2 Tournaments / Re: ICW3 Week 5
September 15, 2013, 04:54:00 PM
Quote from: {212}FrenchFryZ on September 15, 2013, 04:46:21 PM
Basically, if they can get UP TO* 2 more players than the other team has then the defenders CAN have those 2 people, but the attacking team shouldn't have to compensate by getting ride of two people that were ready to have a fun time playing.
#107
SWBF 1 and 2 Tournaments / Re: ICW3 Week 5
September 15, 2013, 04:42:35 PM
I thought the same as Fryz until I was shown the post again by Elite. Yes we should have had 2 less in the end. Which, we did for part of it I guess, Mat joined just over halfway through and someone lagged out for a bit. The thing I hate the most is asking players to leave because we have too many.
This rule would have also affected Streets because it could have been an 8vs5 when it was only a 5vs5 but I am not complaining since the rule was only made earlier today or yesterday night.
I would suggest setting a limit to how much the teams can be outnunbered by as the attacking team willl always struggle with a 2 man disadvantage especially if CPing is the game.
For example:
(if the difference was kept to 2 as a maximum)
Team A have 10 players, Team D have 14 players. Battle will be 10vs12
Team A have 12 players, Team D have 10 players. Battle will be 10vs10
#108
SWBF 1 and 2 Tournaments / Re: Explanation
September 15, 2013, 11:21:46 AM
Ffs, do not keep referring to previous weeks all the time...
For the final time:
Members: 9
Engel, 
Mart,
Sonic,
Harry,
Josh,
BabyEater,                                     
FrenchFryz,
Nico,
Zer0

Mercs: 5
Anyder,
Jumper,
Jamman(or whoever it was),
Elmo,
Wild
9:5 rounded to 2:1.
Happy? Ofc not... But I or any 212 representative will not discuss this with you on here. PM one of us, sure.. if it bothers you that much.

Back to topic.

#109
SWBF 1 and 2 Tournaments / Re: Explanation
September 15, 2013, 10:20:25 AM
Shap was a name that I heard mentioned. He is an inactive FC member as far as I am aware and could have taken that name. However he still needed the merc tag. Unit and Shapown were on the server at the same time.
#110
Tech Support / Re: Tunngle: Network busy
September 15, 2013, 08:01:06 AM
For the record I joined some other room (completely random) which had 13 people in it (not swbf2) and it worked for me.
#111
SWBF 1 and 2 Tournaments / Re: Explanation
September 15, 2013, 04:53:54 AM
@Rage, the reason YAK would be not "abandoned" is only because of numbers. Yes, a minority of YAK did wrong. But now Majesty has been banned and various other players have come clean there is no problem with them carrying on aside from the fact that their numbers may be lower than 1.0 and 212.
#112
It couldn't have been a problem before as in the ICW we have at almost  20vs20 battles and there were surely more than just 5 other people on it.
#113
SWBF 1 and 2 Tournaments / Re: Explanation
September 14, 2013, 06:05:37 PM
Yeah, you are welcome to join 212, if you dare ;)
It was a very bold thing to do; both come clean as you are, and to set up a tournament that has been such a success despite various problems. I respect you for that, and how you managed to be unbiased throughout.
#114
Does this sort the problem with having too many people in the lobby?
#115
SWBF 1 and 2 Tournaments / Re: ICW3 Week 5
September 14, 2013, 01:44:02 PM
Elite, Unit(?) and someone else left I think. It was at least 9 at one point
#116
SWBF 1 and 2 Tournaments / Re: ICW3 Week 5
September 14, 2013, 05:37:29 AM
It deoesn't matter I don't think. 5EST should work okay I just need to check but leave it at that for now :P
#117
SWBF 1 and 2 Tournaments / Re: ICW3 Week 5
September 13, 2013, 08:39:35 AM
At the moment I can make nearly all of them. But things will change I bet.
#118
SWBF 1 and 2 Tournaments / Re: ICW3 Week 5
September 12, 2013, 08:50:52 AM
Quote from: Shazam on September 11, 2013, 05:31:53 PM
Attacking clan: YAK
Defending clan: 212
Planet: Yavin 4: Arena
YAK's side: CIS
Day/time: Saturday, 5:00 PM EST

Hey, can we make this an hour earlier? So 4EST/10berlin.

Oven for the rule, maybe there should be a minimum? Like 8 or something. So if say 1.0 attack 212 with only 6 player 212 can still have 8 players otherwise there is no advantage but for the attackers by choosing the side? Or the rule that a team can only be outnumbered by a maximum of... 2/3? Just a suggestion.
#119
SWBF 1 and 2 Tournaments / Re: ICW3 Week 5
September 11, 2013, 01:55:50 PM
We will give you the list by thursday. We will be attacking Mos Eisley and Coruscant, the details will be posted later.
#120
Videos and Screen Shots / Re: Funny SWBF pics
September 10, 2013, 04:45:32 AM
Kit - read that in 15 Secs, dayum.
But very nice ;)