ICW3 Week 5

[{PLA}gdh92]

I ask that YAK ask their players to stay at their cps, and to not lay pre mines.

Sorry, we had a new player, I know she didn't come back straight away but she did tell you about the mine (I think) and you did kill her.
I'm trying to get more players involved but that does have risks...

[{212}FrenchFryZ]

It's all fun and games! Come on guys instead of a tournment lets just call it a.....ICW 3 FunTime? i got nothing else but it is fun and a game lets all get along.

[{TCE}Call-of-Duty]

It's all fun and games! Come on guys instead of a tournment lets just call it a.....ICW 3 FunTime? i got nothing else but it is fun and a game lets all get along.

i second this we need more fun time that is stress free and fun

[Black Water]

Elite asked for me to take pic of minimap

[Gen.Hond{snp}]

1.0 takes Mustifar and Dust.

GG's

[Anyder]

Elite asked for me to take pic of minimap

I like ur minimap with no radar, mart.
I think he wants one like that

[BlackScorpion]

I like ur minimap with no radar, mart.

We've already been over this subject, okay?

[Anyder]

Im saying nothing else than i like it lol

[-=(212) Nixo=-]

I thought the same as Fryz until I was shown the post again by Elite. Yes we should have had 2 less in the end. Which, we did for part of it I guess, Mat joined just over halfway through and someone lagged out for a bit. The thing I hate the most is asking players to leave because we have too many.
This rule would have also affected Streets because it could have been an 8vs5 when it was only a 5vs5 but I am not complaining since the rule was only made earlier today or yesterday night.
I would suggest setting a limit to how much the teams can be outnunbered by as the attacking team willl always struggle with a 2 man disadvantage especially if CPing is the game.
For example:
(if the difference was kept to 2 as a maximum)
Team A have 10 players, Team D have 14 players. Battle will be 10vs12
Team A have 12 players, Team D have 10 players. Battle will be 10vs10

[{212}FrenchFryZ]

Basically, if they can get 2 more players than the other team has then the defenders CAN have those 2 people, but the attacking team shouldn't have to compensate by getting ride of two people that were ready to have a fun time playing.


Edit:Indeed Nixo right.

[-=(212) Nixo=-]

Basically, if they can get UP TO* 2 more players than the other team has then the defenders CAN have those 2 people, but the attacking team shouldn't have to compensate by getting ride of two people that were ready to have a fun time playing.

[Black Water]

heres some other guys

[hellish hellbird]

http://screenshot.xfire.com/s/128858543-3.jpg

[Oven]

The rule is what SP quoted: everyone gets 8, then after that 2-man kicks in for D.

I can't really tell based on what people have posted if there were any violations of this rule yesterday. Were there? The sooner you respond the sooner Week 6 goes up.

And yes, the rule was given on Saturday. I know this may have caused confusion, but Saturday was ridiculous. The "let's just play" reasoning is justified to an extent.

By the way, there's a million possible ways to give a rule like this. I don't know that this is the best one. It was arrived at through trial-and-error.

And nice to see Led playing.

[Black Water]

I think, that below 8, any team can be out numbered, but above 8, the teams have to be the same. Just a suggestion.