Poll
Question:
Changes
Option 1: 2 attacks (with hour min spacing)
votes: 11
Option 2: 3 attacks (with hour min spacing and 6 max per day)
votes: 7
ICW4 Official Map Pack (http://speedy.sh/X83fa/ICW4-Official-Map-Pack.7z)Week 4 Map is Here (http://www.swbfgamers.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=8121.0;attach=3698;image)Rules (http://www.swbfgamers.com/index.php?topic=7924.0)
No clan or clan not participating? Anyone can participate in ICW4 games by joining YAK here (http://www.swbfgamers.com/index.php?topic=7928.0)
Administration:Lead Admins:Dark Phantom (xfire: phantom567459)
Oven/Joseph (joseph9371)
Admins: Kelle (kellemarcruiser)
PatriotNorwood (norwood96)
Syrion (nykwoonjinn)
W3 results:
- FC+UEF defends Jabba from YAK
FC+UEF takes Mygeeto from YAK
FC+UEF takes Mustafar from BOB
FC+UEF takes Dantooine from BOB
FC+UEF defends Citadel from BOB
FC+UEF defends Egypt from BOB - YAK takes Dagobah from BOB
YAK takes Nar Shaddaa from FC+UEF
YAK defends CC from BOB
Still 3 attacks.
Battle Schedule:Saturday:2 EST (8 Berlin) / YAK@FC+UEF / Mustafar / CW
3 (9) / YAK@FC+UEF / Italia / GCW
3:30 (9:30) / BOB@YAK / CC / GCW
4 (10) / YAK@FC+UEF / Citadel / CW
4:30 (10:30) / BOB@YAK / Nar Shaddaa / CW
5 (11) / BOB@FC+UEF / Jabba / GCW
6:30 (12:30a) / FC+UEF@YAK / Platforms / CW
7 (1a) / FC+UEF@YAK / Dagobah / GCW
Sunday:3 (9) / FC+UEF @YAK / Kamino / CW
Attacking clan: FC/UEF
Defending clan: YAK
Planet: Platforms
Date: Saturday August 9th
Time: 6:30 PM EST
Era/Side: CIS
Server location: Chicago
Attacking clan: FC/UEF
Defending clan: YAK
Planet: Dagobah
Date: Saturday August 9th
Time: 7:00 PM EST
Era/Side: Empire
Server location: Chicago
Attacking clan: FC/UEF
Defending clan: YAK
Planet: Kamino
Date: Sunday August 10th
Time: 3PM EST
Era/Side: CIS
Server location: Chicago
Quote from: Phobos on August 03, 2014, 10:40:52 PM
Attacking clan: FC/UEF
Defending clan: BOB
Planet: Dagobah
Date: TBA
Time: TBA
Era/Side: TBA
Server location: Chicago
I'm pretty sure Yak owns Dagobah, we took it on Saturday, I think BOB only owns Yavin.
The map of the week:
Quote from: {PLA}gdh92 on August 04, 2014, 06:47:24 AM
I'm pretty sure Yak owns Dagobah, we took it on Saturday, I think BOB only owns Yavin.
yeah i was going by last weeks map the post is updated now
Attacking clan: BOB
Defending clan: YAK
Planet: Bespin - Cloud City
Date: Saturday August 9th
Time: 3:30PM EST
Era/Side: BOB chooses Empire
Server location: Chicago
Attacking clan: BOB
Defending clan: YAK
Planet: Nar Shadaar - Rooftops
Date: Saturday August 9th
Time: 4:30PM EST
Era/Side: BOB chooses CIS
Server location: Chicago
Attacking clan: BOB
Defending clan: FC/UEF
Planet: Tatooine - Jabba's Palace
Date: Saturday August 9th
Time: 5:00PM EST
Era/Side: BOB chooses Rebels
Server location: Chicago
Attacking clan: YAK
Defending clan: FC/UEF
Planet: Mustafar
Date: Saturday
Time: 2PM EST
Era/Side: Republic
Server location: Chicago
Attacking clan: YAK
Defending clan: FC/UEF
Planet: Italia
Date: Saturday
Time: 3PM EST
Era/Side: Empire
Server location: Chicago
Attacking clan: YAK
Defending clan: FC/UEF
Planet: Rhen Var: Citadel
Date: Saturday
Time: 4PM EST
Era/Side: CIS
Server location: Chicago
Sorry about the multiple edits if anyone is using this post. YAK is still in discussions. :)
Ben83 is now a member of BOB for the tournament, as is Rem!x.
Specs, if everyone is ready but you we start without you.
FC defends Mustafar
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
FC defends Italia
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
YAK defends CC
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
FC defends Cit
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
YAK defends Nar Shaddaa
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
FC defends Jabba
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
FC takes Platforms
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
FC takes Dagobah
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
FC Takes Dag
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
FC Takes Platforms
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
Today was very hectic, with some battles being delayed due to the tight half-hour scheduling. Several people suggested going back to 2 attacks, and I agree with them. Objections?
Either that or, force better spacing. Either by making them an hour apart or making one on another day. But, no I do not object to limiting it to just two.
Quote from: PatriotNorwood on August 09, 2014, 04:30:58 PM
Either that or, force better spacing. Either by making them an hour apart or making one on another day. But, no I do not object to limiting it to just two.
Yes I was thinking, one of these options:
1. 2 attacks
2. Hour minimum spacing, and no more than 6 on one day.
Poll added, vote please.
Quote from: Oven on August 09, 2014, 04:22:22 PM
Today was very hectic, with some battles being delayed due to the tight half-hour scheduling. Several people suggested going back to 2 attacks, and I agree with them. Objections?
I don't think going back to 2 attacks would fix the half-hour schedule delays. Logically, the solution to that problem would be longer delays between battles, not less battles.
Quote from: Phobos on August 09, 2014, 07:30:04 PM
I don't think going back to 2 attacks would fix the half-hour schedule delays. Logically, the solution to that problem would be longer delays between battles, not less battles.
That's true. I think there's two issues: delays from half-hour scheduling, and fatigue from having e.g. 8 battles in one day. I'll change the poll to reflect this.
I would definatley prefer just two attacks, that day was hectic to say the least. Or at least plan another 3 of the battles for the following day? Spreading it out more.
I would prefer to have 2 attacks per week. And because FC gets a lot of the attacks we usually have 7-8 of the battles. It is difficult to set aside 7 hours in a day to play SWBF. I enjoy playing this game, but I have other things to do and the enjoyment isn't there after the first few battles.
FC Takes Kamino
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
Good games this weekend and we had some nice turnouts. Just a shame it could never be both teams at once :)
One thing we should probably settle now. Kamino had the re-enforcements changed for Republic today which we weren't told about before. Can we please get a rule on this? I thought stock maps weren't changed.
Please note this isn't a complaint about the battle. Although I think it unbalances the map FC/UEF clearly won by a large margin today and this wouldn't change that :)
Quote from: {PLA}gdh92 on August 10, 2014, 12:44:51 PM
One thing we should probably settle now. Kamino had the re-enforcements changed for Republic today which we weren't told about before. Can we please get a rule on this? I thought stock maps weren't changed.
We make stock maps more fair by setting special units equal (or eliminating them). Why not make them even more fair by setting reinforcements equal?
We had no rule before (I searched the forum to see if it came up before, it didn't), and the important thing in this case is just to write one down and stick to it, so I suggest equal reinforcements always.
Are there any other maps with this issue?
I think Kamino's the only map. It's not a huge issue anyway, I only bought it up because a few YAK noticed that the numbers had changed.
I'm slightly in favour of keeping the standard re-enforcement numbers as the developers obviously did that for a reason but like you say we've changed other things, we just need a rule for server hosts so a team doesn't look during a map and wonder where all their troops have gone. :)