He can do what he wants in his servers.  It just means nobody will play in them, he can play by himself for all we care.

I started playing with about 40kbps.  Yes, you read that right. KBPS.  My ping was extremely high and I was called a lagger for much of my early playing days.  I could not play on Tunngle due to such slow Internet.  Gladly, people played with me and knew I would have those lag spikes, and I became a good player (I think so).

I understand these are your rules, but the term "lagger" is overused.  In fact, it is nearly impossible to purposely be a "lagger".  The host has control of most to all of the lag.  The rest is the player's fault.  Because one player has bad ping does not impact the whole server as much as people like to think.

Quote from: Helios on September 03, 2013, 08:08:21 PM
Whats the deal if the map has it?

I'm not really quite sure there's a way to do it through the map.  It's a side mod that players would have to download and I'm not sure of any way around that.

Post #1.  Courtesy of Phantom.  I know that this will be rebutted very quickly, but someone needs to start this off.

QuoteI believe Majesty should be banned from the ICW3 for blatantly disobeying rules which he/she was clearly warned about many times in servers, repeatedly saying "idc" or something like that, and continuing.  Poor sportsmanship is not on my list of top things to endorse.

The issue currently in question is whether clans that were previously in ICW3 are allowed to join other clans.  The players that were listed as mercs, most of them had their clans knocked out.  If those players are allowed to join other clans, then the merc rule was followed.  If not, then the battle at Russia was lost.
Members under question:
(Phobos Post)
- Killfire - merc
- Erweitert - A UEF who joined 1.0
- Anyder - A UEF who joined 1.0
- Wusi Wild - A WUSI, most WUSI members left joined 1.0 for ICW
- Nico - Nico is a member, confirmed
- Troy -  A WUSI, joined 1.0
- 212 Dirty harry - merc
- FrenchFryZ - merc


- Better Off Dead - A WUSI, joined 1.0
- Engel - umm we really aren't sure how this one works.  Says not aligned with any clan, yet no merc tag


Also, most EnTen members joined 1.0 for remainder of ICW3 (Jumper, Deagle, etc.)

Quote straight from post on thread that 1.0 on Russia did not have too many mercenaries because our mercenaries were former members who declared membership with 1.0 for the remainder of ICW3 (if Oven declares it legal to do so).  Kamino was not disputed, 1.0 victory.  Eddie's Kastel will be explained by Hond, YAK won the actual battle, but there was a dispute on a glitch (the map is full of them). 212 is not my issue in this post.  Harbor is disputed with mercs now because of the list above and other things.

My opinion on the matter:  if we would have known maps would have turned into a recon fest, we would have stopped it most likely.  As it stands, the recommendations were taken for sides, and recons were not even mentioned, so I believe it shouldn't be changed.  If there is a recon spam fest, then it's the players' responsibility to turn it into something else.

In regards to the mission.lvl mod, if it is determined to be needed, I can make a new one.  But seriously, how hard is it to NOT spawn as a Jet.  If you do, leave and rejoin.  Not that hard. 

Also, if someone dies, just 1 person die on the other team.  And some of us are irritated that battles are starting half an hour late because 1 person will not show up.  Declare everyone, if someone is late, say they will be coming and add them to the official count.

Quote

Quote from: Shazam
Recons will be disabled for Russia, and there will be a server-sided mission.lvl mod preventing anyone from spawning as a special unit.

Enough of this, guys.  There will be a rematch next week on Harbor and Russia.  End of discussion.

It seems to me this is a little out of line.  Asserting oneself is understandable, and in this case is probably needed, but declaring an end to discussion with a decision by one person that will severely impact the rest of the participants of the ICW3 is not looked upon highly by me.  I understand Shazam was appointed 2nd in command, but when the dispute resolution directly benefits the clan that he is a part of that lost both battles, then I am leery, as I know many players are.  We wanted to wait for Oven's decision, as this is his tournament, and deserves respect for organizing this.


P.S.  I wish to commend UNIT 33 for locking the thread before we hit 30 pages.  This just ended up being ridiculous.  I hope I stated my position well and stated everything I wished to address.  Thank you for reading.  Have a nice day!

Ahh Shazam edited.  I was about to say that there was no debate on Kamino.

Since we determined Russia, Harbour is the only one in question right now I thought.  Why are we rescheduling both?

I believe Majesty should be banned from the ICW3 for blatantly disobeying rules which he/she was clearly warned about many times in servers, repeatedly saying "idc" or something like that, and continuing.  Poor sportsmanship is not on my list of top things to endorse.

The issue currently in question is whether clans that were previously in ICW3 are allowed to join other clans.  The players that were listed as mercs, most of them had their clans knocked out.  If those players are allowed to join other clans, then the merc rule was followed.  If not, then the battle at Russia was lost.
Members under question:
(Phobos Post)
- Killfire - merc
- Erweitert - A UEF who joined 1.0
- Anyder - A UEF who joined 1.0
- Wusi Wild - A WUSI, most WUSI members left joined 1.0 for ICW
- Nico - Nico is a member, confirmed
- Troy -  A WUSI, joined 1.0
- 212 Dirty harry - merc
- FrenchFryZ - merc


- Better Off Dead - A WUSI, joined 1.0
- Engel - umm we really aren't sure how this one works.  Says not aligned with any clan, yet no merc tag


Also, most EnTen members joined 1.0 for remainder of ICW3 (Jumper, Deagle, etc.)

Yes, 1.0 is Emp.  I thought Hond said that in his post but I was mistaken.  Sorry for last second.

Count me in for participating.  Not sure if I want to admin or not yet.

Quote from: Sereja on August 29, 2013, 01:59:35 AM
Sometimes, people should be careful with their wishes...
Oh, whell, here goes nothing... Your wish is granted!:
[spoiler][/spoiler]

Hahaha Godzilla v Darth Vader

I believe that, since there are 2 forfeits, one with multiple planets, that each want to give their planets to 1.0, that 1.0 should get their choice of half, and YAK can receive the other half.  There are only 2 teams left, so it would be pointless to have native planets imo.
But that's just me.  It's Oven's choice.

I'm a willing admin when I am online.  I can admin matches at various times this weekend.  I'll log on Xfire when available if anyone needs an admin.

We're going to have a map in a small Earth town soon.   
Good job with this.  One suggestion:  "Yeild" should be "Yield"   

Quote from: Anyder on August 12, 2013, 04:32:56 PM
Attacking Clan: UEF
Defending Clan: 1.0
Planet: Mygeeto
Proposed date/time: August 18, Sunday, 8:30 PM Berlin time
Era/side: To be chosen

Isn't it supposed to be on the hour?

Quote from: Oven on August 04, 2013, 06:30:47 PM
Battles should be scheduled to start on the hour.

It just seems awkward.  But that's just me

7:40 and no TcF nor an admin?

P.S.  Thank you Led for setting up a server

Sides for ICW week 1 no radar (may be subject to change).  Only for mod maps
If you wait, Phobos will have this in a pack with the sides for mod maps
http://www.mediafire.com/?is67z8tum10w7y0