ICW3 Week 7

Started by Oven, September 23, 2013, 04:36:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Maps for fun wars this weekend?

Cloud City
7 (25.9%)
Platforms
2 (7.4%)
Citadel
7 (25.9%)
Docks
1 (3.7%)
Mygeeto
4 (14.8%)
Tranquaan
7 (25.9%)
Mustafar
7 (25.9%)
Dagobah
4 (14.8%)
Streets
5 (18.5%)
Mos
4 (14.8%)
Jabba
6 (22.2%)
Egypt
1 (3.7%)
Russia
2 (7.4%)
Kamino
5 (18.5%)
Dantooine
7 (25.9%)
Harbor
1 (3.7%)
Arena
3 (11.1%)
Temple
1 (3.7%)

Total Members Voted: 27

Voting closed: October 05, 2013, 04:18:12 PM

I think it should just end how it is. We all will probably get into a way bigger argument anyways. And its best to leave it as it is now so it wont be as bad.
Plus 212 has like all European players... I could hardly move on our Arena match.
I don't think it be very fun playing on laggy servers...
https://swbfv1clan.wordpress.com/2013/09/05/icw3-update-2/ When 1.0 beats FC/YAK

http://www.xfire.com/screenshots/128879699 Schduled battle against YAK/FC with 1.0 Ldrs
http://screenshot.xfire.com/s/128576856-4.jpg
Random unscheduled battle against FC with just 1 1.0 Ldr.

I'm sorry I missed this weekends games, as I try to be there so as many people who want to play can play, but I have a ridiculous workload this week not to mention being on that jobs grind.

Most people we lagging I think. Particularly at the start I had some hardcore lagg ;)

@Hond
The lag is a problem. American players had lags but European didn't. That was the first icw war I had with no lag. It is a "continental" problem

Quote from: Kniescheibenzerschredderer on September 29, 2013, 03:36:16 PM
I thikk its enough with just 3 wars.
212 picks sides and everything on 1, and 1.0 picks sides and everything on another one.
In case of draw, Oven can just choose a map and will randomly assign each clan 1 side.
I find this fair.

I like Anyders idea, give each team one last hoorah.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve." -Bilbo Baggins

September 30, 2013, 06:54:38 AM #95 Last Edit: September 30, 2013, 07:00:23 AM by Kniescheibenzerschredderer
Quote from: -=(212) Nixo=- on September 29, 2013, 04:30:40 PM
Most people we lagging I think. Particularly at the start I had some hardcore lagg ;)
Those lags came cause i was connected everytime to the root, just in case i had to kick someone cause of killing after warning x50 times to not kill.

EDIT:
Quote from: {212th} Ldr. Norris on September 30, 2013, 06:04:50 AM
I like Anyders idea, give each team one last hoorah.

Lol, please: u like Kniescheibenzerschredderer's idea =D
Anyder | Talent, Ops & Culture | SWBF & Player Engagement
Email: communityambassador@swbfgamers.com
SWBFSpy Discord: http://discord.swbfspy.com
SWBFSpy Info: http://info.swbfspy.com

How about for next week we create 2 new clans just for the weekend. We could just do like 4 battles, 2 on Saturday, 2 on Sunday. Maybe have the members randomly chosen or have a person choose the members for each clan.

I preper my idea.
So that later awards can be correctly assigned.
Anyder | Talent, Ops & Culture | SWBF & Player Engagement
Email: communityambassador@swbfgamers.com
SWBFSpy Discord: http://discord.swbfspy.com
SWBFSpy Info: http://info.swbfspy.com

I like the idea of one last battle each. With 3 clans we can all play each other. We should all pick a map each that we enjoy and have random sides. Maybe even play both sides each in case the first time ends really quickly. ;)
I thing Stings idea is a good one for the future but that's for another time.
I play less now but I'll always be around, lets keep this site and battlefront going. :)

Well gdh, i mean to do a 212 vs 1.0
Mainly cause we have most maps --> Planets left: 1.0 = 9     212 = 7    YAK = 2
I hope nixo has updated that in case it was needed lol
Anyder | Talent, Ops & Culture | SWBF & Player Engagement
Email: communityambassador@swbfgamers.com
SWBFSpy Discord: http://discord.swbfspy.com
SWBFSpy Info: http://info.swbfspy.com

Quote from: vansting on September 30, 2013, 10:55:36 AM
How about for next week we create 2 new clans just for the weekend. We could just do like 4 battles, 2 on Saturday, 2 on Sunday. Maybe have the members randomly chosen or have a person choose the members for each clan.
(people from 1.0, 212 and yak split up into those 2 temporary clans)  GDH's idea is better.

Quote from: Kniescheibenzerschredderer on September 30, 2013, 11:44:35 AM
Well gdh, i mean to do a 212 vs 1.0
Mainly cause we have most maps --> Planets left: 1.0 = 9     212 = 7    YAK = 2
I hope nixo has updated that in case it was needed lol
Updated what? Those are the figures of last week so I haven't changed a think if that is what you are talking about.
@Hond, if we carry on any more battles in european servers it won't be as laggy for you, as Anyder explained what the problem was. But that is how it is for most Europeans in American servers.
@Van Sting, your idea is a fun one however it would completely change what the ICW is and has been. I would suggest leaving that for another sort of 'tournament'.

September 30, 2013, 02:10:42 PM #102 Last Edit: September 30, 2013, 02:19:26 PM by Oven
Can the leaders of the three clans post their official opinion on whether the tournament should end now?

If there's a dissenting voice, I don't think it would be fair to end it just yet.

If we decide to end, we can discuss what to do next week.

No need to rush, you can talk with your clan mates about it.

-----------------------------------

I would like to point out that once the ICW ends, the ICA can still be picked up as before. The ICA is lower-maintenance that the ICW, in fact, requires no maintenance at all ideally. In other words, large (or small), fun battles can still happen on a regular basis.

In fact, we could even change the ICA to reflect some of the good ideas that have been raised in this thread.

Quote from: Oven on September 30, 2013, 02:10:42 PM

I would like to point out that once the ICW ends, the ICA can still be picked up as before. The ICA is lower-maintenance that the ICW, in fact, requires no maintenance at all ideally. In other words, large (or small), fun battles can still happen on a regular basis.

In fact, we could even change the ICA to reflect some of the good ideas that have been raised in this thread.
I second that. I think its ok to keep having fws after ICW3 ends.
But, just wondering, will any ICA rule change ?
Anyder | Talent, Ops & Culture | SWBF & Player Engagement
Email: communityambassador@swbfgamers.com
SWBFSpy Discord: http://discord.swbfspy.com
SWBFSpy Info: http://info.swbfspy.com

I would prefer the ICW3 to end now personally and we could have Funwars starting this weekend for fun. I really don't want to bother with any problems whether it be Majesty(Not YAKS fault), Lag, Mercs, Fakes, Jets, or anything because it has upset me very deeply. What if another week 4 happens? What if we all start pointing fingers at each other? It would be a much happier ending the ICW3 at a good note with no one losing planets and defending their homelands.

We should still have weekly fun wars. Start the ICA for this weekend. It will hopefully be less intense and probably way more enjoyable. I've only had head aches ever since week 4.

I understand 1.0 has more planets and I can understand 212 for wanting to do more. This is their 3rd time in it? I'd say go for a tie and award both clans for even a happier ending. (Plus it be nice if some people other then FC for once to have a winning medal)(No offense to FC because there are some great members in it)

I say End the ICW3. 
https://swbfv1clan.wordpress.com/2013/09/05/icw3-update-2/ When 1.0 beats FC/YAK

http://www.xfire.com/screenshots/128879699 Schduled battle against YAK/FC with 1.0 Ldrs
http://screenshot.xfire.com/s/128576856-4.jpg
Random unscheduled battle against FC with just 1 1.0 Ldr.