ICW3 Week 5

[SirPimped]

As I quoted earlier, it stated that above 8 people, the defender gets a 2 man advantage. The admin was Scorpion and he even explained the rule to 212, but they didn't believe him. The players ended up being 11 v 11. It should have been 11 v 9. Because 212 wouldn't ask more people to leave, Scorpion just started counting down because the match was already delayed by a great amount.

The rule was in affect, and the admin of the match knew the rule. It wasn't followed. Nixo who is admin now even said the rule wasn't followed and I thank him for being honest and upfront about the rules.

I thought the same as Fryz until I was shown the post again by Elite. Yes we should have had 2 less in the end.

[Oven]

OK, thanks.

(BTW, Scorpion did the right thing.)

[Gen.Hond{snp}]

Going back to old rules wasn't it allowed to have equal teams if the Attackers were able to have the same amount of Defenders. Why is that part different about having equal teams? Wouldn't you want to have equal matches? Find a new solution for an advantage for defenders?

I was mistaken by the rules then too because I thought for that 11v11 you were able to have equal teams. (because thats like a best case scenario) I thought the 2 up rule was that Defenders were able to have a limit of 2 only more players then the defense. I guess it was switched around? Where the attackers must have less then 2 when its about an 8v8.

If it was my mistake and Fry was saying the same thing as I on the server. So there were multiple things.

[-=(212) Nixo=-]

We were down 1 at the start of the match until I realised this and asked Mart to come back halfway through.
Defenders could always have up to 2 more players than attackers. That is what I and a feew others thought. Would that work?