SWBFGamers

ICW3 Official Map Pack Download (http://www.swbfgamers.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=1028)

Rules and General Information (http://www.swbfgamers.com/index.php?topic=6931.0)

WEEK SEVEN MAP WILL GO HERE
[spoiler][/spoiler]

Week 6 results

• 1.0 takes Citadel from YAK
  1.0 defends Cloud City from YAK
  1.0 defends Dantooine from YAK
• 212 takes Platforms from Natives
  212 takes Streets from YAK
• YAK defends Dagobah from 1.0

---

Remarks

1.

Quote from: Buckler on September 23, 2013, 04:03:27 AM
Anymore crap not related to ICW3 and I shut it down.

Keep this kind of stuff off of this website.

If the ICW3 gets shut down and it continues, then I start banning from this website.

Take this seriously.

This is a map:

Sorry to bust you once again, Bespin is owned by 212.

CC is owned by 1.0

[spoiler]
(https://www.swbfgamers.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmemberfiles.freewebs.com%2F78%2F50%2F75505078%2Fphotos%2Fundefined%2Feasy%2520win.png&hash=e1549e28b7169d461e3275c2d6de13c96bbc8f55)
[/spoiler]

U mean Bespin PLATFORMS Maybe ?

Fixed... it's been a long day.

Quote from: Kniescheibenzerschredderer on September 24, 2013, 11:07:01 AM
CC is owned by 1.0

[spoiler]
(https://www.swbfgamers.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmemberfiles.freewebs.com%2F78%2F50%2F75505078%2Fphotos%2Fundefined%2Feasy%2520win.png&hash=e1549e28b7169d461e3275c2d6de13c96bbc8f55)
[/spoiler]

U mean Bespin PLATFORMS Maybe ?

Yeah, I keep forgetting that there are two.

Quote from: UNIT 33 on September 24, 2013, 10:36:21 AM
This is a map:

As a suggestion 33 can you rename platforms to birdland cause...thats my homemap... :D

Current planet numbers:
1.0 have 9
212 have 7
YAK have 2

I hope 212 and 1.0 attack each other to instead of getting distracted by fighting YAK and one getting an advantage Hint. Hint.

[spoiler]It's not going to happen is it... :)[/spoiler]

The real question is, will 1.0 and 212 attack each other or just forego the extra attack to just team up on YAK? We are all waiting in suspense  :ohmy:

I think its gonna be 1 attack to yak by 212 and another attack to yak by 1.0
Then 212 will attack 1.0 , and 1.0 will attack 212

Quote from: hellish hellbird on September 24, 2013, 12:47:47 PM
As a suggestion 33 can you rename platforms to birdland cause...thats my homemap... :D

You are joking, of course?

Ya ofc we are going to attack each other. Why wouldn't we? The more battles the better, right? Actually when I say we I speak for 212. I do not know what 1.0 plan to do.

Attacking Clan: 212
Defending Clan: YAK
Planet: Degobah
Proposed Time/Date: Saturday 28th, 4PM EST
Era/Side: TBD

Attacking Clan: 212
Defending Clan: 1.0
Planet: Yavin, Temple
Proposed Time/Date: Saturday 28th, 3PM EST
Era/Side: TBD

Quote from: -RepublicCommando- on September 24, 2013, 01:36:12 PM
You are joking, of course?

Why would anyone joke about such a serious subject?

Attacking Clan: 1.0
Defending Clan: YAK
Planet: Docks
Proposed Time/Date: Sunday 29th, 3:30PM EST
Era/Side: GCW Rebels

Attacking Clan: 1.0
Defending Clan: 212
Planet: Yavin, Arena
Proposed Time/Date: Sunday 29th, 4PM EST
Era/Side: CW Republic

I don't really think it would have been an advantage if we did just attack YAK, just less stress for us. 1.0 and 212 would still have gotten the chance to attack each other later ;)

Quote from: Gen.Hond{snp} on September 24, 2013, 01:55:41 PM
Attacking Clan: 1.0
Defending Clan: YAK
Planet: Docks
Proposed Time/Date: Saturday 29th, 3PM EST
Era/Side: GCW Rebels

Sunday 29th?

Quote from: -=(212) Nixo=- on September 24, 2013, 02:52:24 PM
Sunday 29th?

WAY to go hond...

Attacking Clan: YAK
Defending Clan: 1.0
Planet: Citadel
Proposed Time/Date: Saturday 29th, 2PM EST
Era/Side: GCW Empire

Attacking Clan: YAK
Defending Clan: 212
Planet: Streets
Proposed Time/Date: Sunday 29th, 2PM EST
Era/Side: GCW Empire

These might be updated later by myself or SirPimped.
[spoiler]Just so everyone knows my suggestion about 1.0 and 212 attacking each other instead of YAK was just a joke because we have so few planets, I didn't mean to offend anyone. I want us to have battles. :)[/spoiler]

Can we have a European Server for that battle on Streets?
We choose Empire for Degobah and Empire for Yavin Temple.

Quote from: -=(212) Nixo=- on September 25, 2013, 02:22:40 PM
Can we have a European Server for that battle on Streets?

Obviously I don't mind but it depends how many West coast Americans want to play. I'll see who responds.
Do you have someone who can host if we agree?

I would prefer it to be hosted by Buckler, but if the rest of YAK agree then it's ok.

Quote from: {PLA}gdh92 on September 25, 2013, 02:28:40 PM
Obviously I don't mind but it depends how many West coast Americans want to play. I'll see who responds.
Do you have someone who can host if we agree?

I dont think you guys really care about west coast players since all battles youve posted last week and this week have been extremely early xS

Quote from: hellish hellbird on September 25, 2013, 02:52:00 PM
I dont think you guys really care about west coast players since all battles youve posted last week and this week have been extremely early xS

Its very difficult to have scheduled times between continents obviously. Especially when you try for example to have russian players come during a good time for west coast players. 1.0 have players from both those times zones so we try to make it an okay time.

Which is why I'm asking for the battles to be moved once again. 2 EST is okay for our European portion of the clan but still to early for lots of Americans such as the ones in the west coast like California.  I'm going to suggest making the battles in between each other (we have done this in previous weeks)

So since 212 took already 3 EST I suggest we schedule it to be 3:30 EST. And I hope you agree because the Degobah match was like 3 EST and I was telling YAK members we would only have 1-3 players including myself. I cannot schedule battles where there is going to be 3 of us and 10 opponents.  And please remember that Degobah match didn't start till late because we were off by a member to allow a merc.

So this battle is going to have to happen 3:30 for the earliest time. I don't want a 3v10 and No one else does. And that is somewhat early still for PST members at 12:30.

Quote from: SirPimped on September 25, 2013, 02:32:06 PM
I would prefer it to be hosted by Buckler, but if the rest of YAK agree then it's ok.

I believe it is up to the defending team to decide what type of server. YAK would only need to check with each other if someone is attacking is asking for European server.

Quote from: -=(212) Nixo=- on September 25, 2013, 02:22:40 PM
Can we have a European Server for that battle on Streets?

Yes Nixo your defending. Its like 1 of only 2 advantages defenders get.

Quote from: Gen.Hond{snp} on September 25, 2013, 03:19:05 PM
I believe it is up to the defending team to decide what type of server.

Correct.

I forgot about the defending rule for servers sorry. Obviously that's fine then. :)

Quote from: hellish hellbird on September 25, 2013, 02:52:00 PM
I dont think you guys really care about west coast players since all battles youve posted last week and this week have been extremely early xS

I'm trying my best to keep everyone happy here as I'm sure everyone else is, it's very hard to find compromises that please everyone.
Ironically YAK were going to have a 5est battle before but a lot of our US members complained they wanted it earlier. :)
If you have an idea please suggest it.
(Finishing later than 5est is too late for most Europeans and for some reason, although YAK is pretty evenly split with time zones, we struggle to get members at 5est so moving to then would just mean we get no players and the match wouldn't be any fun for either team anyway).

Quote from: Gen.Hond{snp} on September 25, 2013, 03:19:05 PM
So this battle is going to have to happen 3:30 for the earliest time. I don't want a 3v10 and No one else does. And that is somewhat early still for PST members at 12:30.

That seems like a good idea if we get the previous match started on time, YAK is here to help, just remember how nice we were when it comes to wiping us out. ;)
Our matches are now;
Attacking Clan: YAK
Defending Clan: 1.0
Planet: Citadel
Proposed Time/Date: Saturday 29th, 3.30PM EST
Era/Side: GCW Empire

Attacking Clan: YAK
Defending Clan: 212
Planet: Streets
Proposed Time/Date: Sunday 29th, 2PM EST
Era/Side: GCW Empire

Are 1.0 and 212 happy with those times?

Quote from: {PLA}gdh92 on September 26, 2013, 09:42:51 AM

That seems like a good idea if we get the previous match started on time, YAK is here to help, just remember how nice we were when it comes to wiping us out. ;)

Thanks Gdh. Yes we are going to have to make sure the 212 match starts on track. And I'll remember the true members of YAK who played fairly.

Yes that should be okay.

I've set up the servers for today's battles.

Unfortunately, I'll probably miss them all today. Can someone cover for me?

(If the only people who can do it are participants (Hond, Nixo, GDH, etc.) then you can play and admin, it will be fine. The last two weeks have been smooth, once the playing begins.)

1.0 defends Yavin Temple
Majesty played as '' (212)Merc. '' and took jet.

Yeah confirmed 1.0 won.
I am annoyed that majesty faked a 212 and after being booted repeatedly kept rejoining and potentially lost us the match as she lost the tank :/

Can we have screenshots of battle results this week?

http://www.xfire.com/screenshots/128909053

So I'm confused guys. Who are half the people on YAK?
Mormon Jesus
Sith Emo
LOBSTER
im the emo of swbf

I believe Sith is Elite most likely. I am unsure of JM and Lobster.
And im the emo of swbf is Majesty.

Majesty also was in our game ruining as {212}merc. or something. He was jetting around as I and several others have pictures.
No matter because 1.0 defended temple and defended Citidal.

Something should be done about the Degobah match though since there was some uninvited guest and some mysterious people.

Who acted as admin? Did anyone ask them ingame who they were? Do the "leaders" of YAK know who they were?

Quote from: Gen.Hond{snp} on September 28, 2013, 02:15:39 PM
http://www.xfire.com/screenshots/128909053

So I'm confused guys. Who are half the people on YAK?
Mormon Jesus
Sith Emo
LOBSTER
im the emo of swbf

Sith is Elite
im the emo of swbf is Majesty
Mormon Jesus --> idk
LOBSTER = no idea

Quote from: Oven on September 28, 2013, 02:22:42 PM
Who acted as admin? Did anyone ask them ingame who they were? Do the "leaders" of YAK know who they were?

Wild was, and we asked but they didn't wanna answer...
I dont think they know them, except of Elite (Sith Emo) and majesty (im the emo of swbf)

Quote from: Kniescheibenzerschredderer on September 28, 2013, 02:24:04 PM
Wild was, and we asked but they didn't wanna answer...
I dont think they know them, except of Elite (Sith Emo) and majesty (im the emo of swbf)

Can anyone else confirm this?

If they didn't wanna answer then they didn't wanna win the planet very badly.

Well, Elite is only one in YAK team who can ''speak'' (cause he cant really speak spanish i think) spanish
Also, i took a pic form the server Baby was (In the citadel/temple server) and guess what ?
Majesty was in same server, and there was someone called (212)Merc. :)

Ya I can confirm what you said. Lobster I think was FA Fierobull but I don't know for sure.

I showed up a bit later and didn't have time to check who everyone was. I was asking who people were, but I didn't get everyone to say before they started a countdown.

Quote from: SirPimped on September 28, 2013, 02:35:55 PM
I showed up a bit later and didn't have time to check who everyone was. I was asking who people were, but I didn't get everyone to say before they started a countdown.

Lies. We asked about 10 mins before game started. Then u came asked and about 5 mins later Wild did the countdown
Thats why we started around 10:35pm

Attention: I want to reserve this thread, which is titled "ICW3 Week 7", for information, discussion, etc., which concerns ICW3 Week 7. Therefore I've removed an irrelevant post.

Thanks for understanding.

I suggest you get a new password that is handed out right before the match by private tunngle chat.  That should cut down on issues, and will also let you know the tunngle id of the players.

i was there the whole time except when i changed my tags 3 times cause noone knew how many yak there were....anyways ya i asked when i had my merc tags on about majesty noone said anything when i left and came back with spec tags on sirpimped was there and i asked and noone said anything and when i came back to the server cause they brought more people still noone said anything...i doubt 1 man woulda changed the end results of the battle but either way noone was responding to the fact majesty was on thier team

Quote from: hellish hellbird on September 28, 2013, 03:22:55 PM
i was there the whole time except when i changed my tags 3 times cause noone knew how many yak there were....anyways ya i asked when i had my merc tags on about majesty noone said anything when i left and came back with spec tags on sirpimped was there and i asked and noone said anything and when i came back to the server cause they brought more people still noone said anything...i doubt 1 man woulda changed the end results of the battle but either way noone was responding to the fact majesty was on thier team

I'm sorry if you said that, but I didn't see it. I've repeatedly told Majesty not to play and I guess I just assumed he wasn't there. I was asking people who they were like when Lobster came in, but of course people just ignored it and wouldn't say anything. Normally I would account for who is there in a pre-server, but I wasn't able to show up until the game was getting started. I don't really know what to do. Maybe we need to have everyone pick one name and they have to stick to it so it's easier to account for who is who.

Quote from: SirPimped on September 28, 2013, 04:05:01 PM
I'm sorry if you said that, but I didn't see it. I've repeatedly told Majesty not to play and I guess I just assumed he wasn't there. I was asking people who they were like when Lobster came in, but of course people just ignored it and wouldn't say anything. Normally I would account for who is there in a pre-server, but I wasn't able to show up until the game was getting started. I don't really know what to do. Maybe we need to have everyone pick one name and they have to stick to it so it's easier to account for who is who.

but....during the countdown....you had wild stop at 2 seconds remaining.....to wait for someone to reconnect....you couldnt...ask for time to straighten it out...even though you yourself in your post said you didnt know who lobster was either? this is the same thing that happened...last week? or was it the week before...either way you guys couldnt get it together STILL?

That one man I am sure would have made a slight difference especially with a positive score. Also Kelle was faked, I think on Citadel. Majesty again? If so that would be 3 battles he took part in despite being banned! 
Is the minimum number of players 4 or 8? With 4 I find that I have to ask every 10mins or so before the battle how many players the opponent's team has. I havn't seen a battle less than 8vs8 in over 2 weeks and just allows me people to play for sure.
The guy could have just rejoined when the battle had already begun. We were already 25mins behind.

Quote from: SirPimped on September 28, 2013, 04:05:01 PM
I don't really know what to do. Maybe we need to have everyone pick one name and they have to stick to it so it's easier to account for who is who.

We made the rosters for this right? YAK has had theirs since the beginning and still have problems. I can't blame you guys because of Majesty because he creates enough trouble as it is. Yet hes a suck up to some people.

Anyways we can figure out some people from a crowd like we could Elite or Majesty. But when we have random people like LOBSTER or Mormon Jesus we have no idea. Plus the Kelle thing apparently someone faked? Nixo said the merc "blue" was Kelle at the temple game?

Agreed on new password.

Yeah, blue was Kelle on Yavin but after soon after the Citadel match I became aware that Kelle was faked.

Sorry I couldn't be there last night. I'm not sure what happened with members, all I know is that I asked a few YAKs on X-fire to join and that a lot of FA's occasionally play for YAK.
Majesty is not part of YAK and I have told him/her not to play repeatedly and banned them when I was ignored, obviously most YAKs don't have the option to ban and unfortunately can't check people are who they claim.

My best guess for who people were
Official YAK
Sith Emo - Elite (pretty sure)
YAKbot - SirPimped
Vansting
Kelle
Disciple

Not sure
I'm the emo of SWBF
Lobster
Mormon Jesus

Edit: I've done that based on the screenshot, I don't know if everyone was in it.

Sorry I can't be more precise but I wasn't there. Whoever the unknowns were (and I think one was probably Fierobull or another FA who is in YAK) I think we had enough proper members that the 2-1 rounded rule was obeyed.

For anyone who wants to know here is our up to date members list for today.
[spoiler]Current YAK members:

   
• Shazam
• gdh92
• vansting
• Gold Man
• UNIT 33
• SleepKiller
• Dbiz
• Phobos/Rage
• Joseph
• SirPimped
• Droideka
• Helios
• Elite
• Kishan
• Disciple
• The Pusher
• Daniel
• Wolf
• Kyram
• David
• Mike
• Drugrep
• FieroBull
• Kelle
• Paksu pepe
• RC 54
• Icetray
• JR1?

[REA]Emma also plays for us but she has never become 'official' so I count her as a merc. There's also a few more FA who have played for YAK but they will have to be mercs until I get their official names.[/spoiler]

Edit 2: It doesn't change much but Fierobull says he didn't play.

The merc rule was fine, they just needed to wear the tag: Merc.Name next time. But if that emo guy was majesty...
Also Helios was there if anyone was woundering why it shows as a 8vs9

I was there yes but i had to go, as there was a family emergency.

Pusher was there as well. Like I said I don't know if Majesty was playing or not. I've told him not to. I was asking people in my team chat who was who, and then then countdown started.

Quote from: SirPimped on September 28, 2013, 04:05:01 PM
Maybe we need to have everyone pick one name and they have to stick to it so it's easier to account for who is who.

I think this is best. How about the name that appears on the clan's roster?

Also, I think Led's password idea is a good one, so we'll implement it starting today. I think that I'll be content to give the passwords to clan leaders over xfire, and they can distribute it to the players they want at the battle.

212 defended Streets. GG

[spoiler](https://www.swbfgamers.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F9rO3dGo.jpg&hash=7c3d9b9b5660198292bacd94a80d9fb433445b18)[/spoiler]

Will there be a punishment for YAK sending majesty to disrupt our war vs 1.0, and YAK allowing majesty, or so they say, to play vs 1.0? I'm sure you guys believe that majesty acted alone, but I doubt it. I mean, if for some reason I came into a YAK vs 1.0 match and disrupted the game by getting on YAK team and made them lose(stealing tank...), 212 would be punished for sure. YAK would accuse 212 of planning it... Which I think YAK sent majesty to be on our team to make us lose. I would ask for a rematch vs 1.0, but that's just too time consuming...   I wouldn't be surprised if Sirpimped or Elite came up with that "brilliant" plan.

Okay if you give out the password to the leaders, the leaders give the password to whomever they want to play the game, whats to keep either the leader or a player that was given the password to give it to someone like Majesty or someone else who is banned from the tournament

Yes, I fear YAK will give the password to majesty so he can disrupt more 212 matches.

Quote from: Ten Numb on September 29, 2013, 01:00:31 PM
Will there be a punishment for YAK sending majesty to disrupt our war vs 1.0, and YAK allowing majesty, or so they say, to play vs 1.0? I'm sure you guys believe that majesty acted alone, but I doubt it. I mean, if for some reason I came into a YAK vs 1.0 match and disrupted the game by getting on YAK team and made them lose(stealing tank...), 212 would be punished for sure. YAK would accuse 212 of planning it... Which I think YAK sent majesty to be on our team to make us lose. I would ask for a rematch vs 1.0, but that's just too time consuming...   I wouldn't be surprised if Sirpimped or Elite came up with that "brilliant" plan.

LOL you should be a comedian.

I'm not saying that YAK would give Majesty the passwords, depending on the circumstances someone else would want to give a banned person like Majesty the passwords. I never said that YAK would do that I just used Majesty as a example mainly because he is the most notable of troublemakers in ICW3

Oh, and if anyone asks why would YAK want 212 to lose vs 1.0, well... their main leader, or whatever, is SirPimped, who is in the anti-212 community. k sting, don't complain if someone decides to disrupt a 1.0 vs YAK match next week.

YAK defends Docks, it was a good close game for the first half. A 1.0 joined during the match but he left after being asked a few times so no complaints. Thanks all.

Quote from: Ten Numb on September 29, 2013, 01:00:31 PM
Will there be a punishment for YAK sending majesty to disrupt our war vs 1.0, and YAK allowing majesty, or so they say, to play vs 1.0? I'm sure you guys believe that majesty acted alone, but I doubt it. I mean, if for some reason I came into a YAK vs 1.0 match and disrupted the game by getting on YAK team and made them lose(stealing tank...), 212 would be punished for sure. YAK would accuse 212 of planning it... Which I think YAK sent majesty to be on our team to make us lose. I would ask for a rematch vs 1.0, but that's just too time consuming...   I wouldn't be surprised if Sirpimped or Elite came up with that "brilliant" plan.

If Majesty did anything it's her problem not YAKs. I am 100% against them ruining your games but YAK sadly can't prevent it.

QuoteIf Majesty did anything it's her problem not YAKs. I am 100% against them ruining your games but YAK sadly can't prevent it.

There your starting to get it unless YAK would give Majesty the passwords then it would be their fault but if someone else did or if she figured it out on her own then it wouldn't be their fault

You mean docks? yes Gdh, but I think a member of YAK told majesty to join our game, I suspect SP...  and if YAK doesn't get punished, I guess anyone can disrupt games, and still play for their teams like majesty does! The only punishment will be that the player gets 'banned', though they can easily make a new tunngle account, while the other clans have to deal with their games being ruined?!?!

Got any proof

Quote from: Ten Numb on September 29, 2013, 01:20:41 PM
You mean docks? yes Gdh, but I think a member of YAK told majesty to join our game, I suspect SP...

Yeah I meant Docks, I must be more tired than I thought to write harbour. I changed it. :)
I can't speak for other members of YAK but I would like to think that they aren't trying to ruin other peoples games.

Quote from: Ten Numb on September 29, 2013, 01:20:41 PM
You mean docks? yes Gdh, but I think a member of YAK told majesty to join our game, I suspect SP...

Here is my conversation with Majesty today. I'm tired of you attacking me without any proof what so ever. Unless you have any proof to back up what you are saying stop talking, and stop posting in this thread.
[spoiler]Conversation started between [FC]SirPimped -={InViS}=- and |FA|Leader.MAJESTY: Sun, Sep  29 13:05:56 2013
[13:05] [FC]SirPimped -={InViS}=-: any FA coming to the game today?
[13:06] |FA|Leader.MAJESTY: oki.
[13:06] [FC]SirPimped -={InViS}=-: you cant play, but other members can play
[13:06] [FC]SirPimped -={InViS}=-: if you know of any
[13:06] |FA|Leader.MAJESTY: Penguin and Paksu should come
[13:07] [FC]SirPimped -={InViS}=-: ok
[13:08] [FC]SirPimped -={InViS}=-: tell them to add gdh92 to xfire
[13:09] [FC]SirPimped -={InViS}=-: and quickly please
[13:09] |FA|Leader.MAJESTY: they aren't on .. :/
[13:09] |FA|Leader.MAJESTY: wait
[13:10] |FA|Leader.MAJESTY: paksu is coming
[13:10] [FC]SirPimped -={InViS}=-: ok tell him to xfire add my xfire sirpimped
[13:11] |FA|Leader.MAJESTY: oki
[13:11] |FA|Leader.MAJESTY: Led is coming for help you
[13:11] [FC]SirPimped -={InViS}=-: ok thanks
[13:13] |FA|Leader.MAJESTY: how many YAK have ?
[13:13] [FC]SirPimped -={InViS}=-: 6
[13:13] |FA|Leader.MAJESTY: against ?
[13:13] [FC]SirPimped -={InViS}=-: idk 12
[13:14] |FA|Leader.MAJESTY: wtf
[13:14] |FA|Leader.MAJESTY: stupid [BLANK] rules
[13:14] [FC]SirPimped -={InViS}=-: they are defenders
Conversation ended: Sun, Sep  29 13:28:25 2013
Conversation started between [FC]SirPimped -={InViS}=- and |FA|Leader.MAJESTY: Sun, Sep  29 14:28:49 2013
[14:28] |FA|Leader.MAJESTY: do i try to come .. ?
[14:31] [FC]SirPimped -={InViS}=-: no you cant play they will check ips[14:31]
[FC]SirPimped -={InViS}=-: sorry
[14:32] [FC]SirPimped -={InViS}=-: if you are z you will have to go
[14:32] |FA|Leader.MAJESTY: ?
[14:32] |FA|Leader.MAJESTY: im not
[14:32] [FC]SirPimped -={InViS}=-: oh ok
[14:35] |FA|Leader.MAJESTY: how many yaks ?
[14:35] [FC]SirPimped -={InViS}=-: idk yet
[14:35] |FA|Leader.MAJESTY: man im sure they are 20 vs 7 yaks
[14:35] |FA|Leader.MAJESTY: what is faire
[14:35] |FA|Leader.MAJESTY: fair*
[14:39] |FA|Leader.MAJESTY: pusher and elite are coming :D
[14:39] [FC]SirPimped -={InViS}=-: ok
Conversation ended: Sun, Sep  29 14:41:40 2013
[/spoiler]

I have repeatedly told Majesty not to play. This is my entire conversation with him today so stop attacking me.

Quote from: Ten Numb on September 29, 2013, 01:12:50 PM
Oh, and if anyone asks why would YAK want 212 to lose vs 1.0, well... their main leader, or whatever, is SirPimped, who is in the anti-212 community. k sting, don't complain if someone decides to disrupt a 1.0 vs YAK match next week.

That sounds like a threat.

You are the yak leader, ofcourse I'm going to suspect you first. By the way... people can choose to leave convo parts out. boo hoo sting, pixels are a big threat.

Who was Lego? Once again another YAK I have no idea who he/she is. And I don't think it would of been an FA (other then Majesty) because there would be no Merc next to it.
Knowing Majesty she/he/IT could just make up a name for a player and fake it.
YAK should have some sort of penalty next week. Several times Fake names and etc. They have had their roster longer then any of us.

Quote from: Ten Numb on September 29, 2013, 01:29:34 PM
You are the yak leader, ofcourse I'm going to suspect you first.

I was in the server telling them to get the player out of there, because I thought another 1.0 was joining meaning attackers would have more defenders. So me and Hond were both telling whoever it was to leave. So why don't you just be quite.

Quote from: SirPimped on September 29, 2013, 01:32:58 PM
I was in the server telling them to get the player out of there, because I thought another 1.0 was joining meaning attackers would have more defenders. So me and Hond were both telling whoever it was to leave. So why don't you just be quite.

Roman was an accident. I asked him to come an hour earlier and he didn't respond until middle of game coming to the server before xfiring me.

He had no kills or deaths so I don't see any problems. Knowing who is who on YAK is a different story that should be address and dealt with since its been happening over and over.

212 won on Yavin. Jed took Jet when 1.0 were down to 1 CP but we killed him after chasing him around the map without him taking a cp xD To be honest I was just laughing.
I will upload a pic of Yavin soon if noone else does.
From now on 212 will always defend on a European server if possible :)

I'll be 'quite' judgemental, btw, I'm talking about majesty in the 212 vs 1.0 war, so why don't you be quiet.

Legos wouldn't do that, his name was faked obviously (Majesty being on the top of the list)

I know we all want fair games but can we please just enjoy what we have for once, I don't know about yesterday but even when we lost streets today I've enjoyed our games, everyone's got along and been friendly which is the whole point of this.
I was at both YAK matches today and they were fair. We have obeyed the rules and all our members were on the list and any others obeyed the merc rule and everyone was nice to each other.
1.0 said they had mercs to play for us and I appreciate that but we didn't know who they were other than the names you gave us but I trusted you to be fair so we let them play. Lego was a merc and I know for a fact they weren't Majesty.
I know I have been representing YAK this week but unless I have to I'm staying out of these arguments, it's not why I play.
Thanks for the games to everyone who came this week.

See I told you, Lego wouldn't have faked, he was a merc, fair and square

You may have obeyed the rules today, but that still doesn't excuse majesty's behavior, and I don't think he acted solo.  So let me get this straight, anyone can interupt a game, get banned, but can play as long as they have a new name? I don't mean to hurt yak too much, but nothing will stop majesty from doing it again unless YAK gets punished.

Majesty isn't in YAK and isn't our responsibility. We have already kicked him out and told him not to play. What more can we do? We can't ban him from the servers. That is an admins job.

Quote from: Ten Numb on September 29, 2013, 01:47:54 PM
You may have obeyed the rules today, but that still doesn't excuse majesty's behavior, and I don't think he acted solo.  So let me get this straight, anyone can interupt a game, get banned, but can play as long as they have a new name? I don't mean to hurt yak too much, but nothing will stop majesty from doing it again unless YAK gets punished.

How will punishing YAK stop Majesty? He isn't in YAK and has been told not to play. He obviously doesn't care if we are punished or not.

Quote from: Ten Numb on September 29, 2013, 01:47:54 PM
You may have obeyed the rules today, but that still doesn't excuse majesty's behavior, and I don't think he acted solo.  So let me get this straight, anyone can interupt a game, get banned, but can play as long as they have a new name? I don't mean to hurt yak too much, but nothing will stop majesty from doing it again unless YAK gets punished.

Majesty is not a YAK problem, Majesty is a ICW3 problem. 

I could threaten to ban you for not controlling Majesty.

I personally think its about time the icw3 just ends... before we all want to kill each other...

What clan was majesty in? YAK. He is doing this for YAK not 212 or 1.0. Like I said, banning someone from the ICW won't work... just look at majesty. go ahead and threaten me.

Quote from: Ten Numb on September 29, 2013, 02:08:33 PM
What clan was majesty in? YAK. He is doing this for YAK not 212 or 1.0. Like I said, banning someone from the ICW won't work... just look at majesty. go ahead and threaten me.

Majesty has not been in YAK for months.

OK, I will ban you if Majesty ever plays in the ICW3 again.

You really need help with your people skills, should probarly interact more. We'll see how long the ban lasts, if you're talking about tunngle, you banned me 2 months ago and I'm still banned, still playing in ICW wars. By the way, Majesty has been "banned" from yak for weeks, not months.

Quote from: Ten Numb on September 29, 2013, 02:15:46 PM
You really need help with your people skills, should probarly interact more. We'll see how long the ban lasts, if you're talking about tunngle, you banned me 2 months ago and I'm still banned, still playing in ICW wars. By the way, Majesty has been "banned" from yak for weeks, not months.

So, you know it is possible for someone that is banned to still participate.  Thanks for illustrating my point.  And also for acknowledging that Majesty is not in YAK anymore.

Anyone else want to teach me about people skills?

Just my opinion: icw has just divided the community MORE cause of the problem with majesty.
So as i told oven and have talked with my mates, maybe its time to end the icw till next ICW.

I repeat this is my opinion.

Quote from: Kniescheibenzerschredderer on September 29, 2013, 02:22:52 PM
Just my opinion: icw has just divided the community MORE cause of the problem with majesty.
So as i told oven and have talked with my mates, maybe its time to end the icw till next ICW.

I repeat this is my opinion.

This thread is about ICW3 week 7.  Feel free to make a new thread.

Quote from: Gen.Hond{snp} on September 29, 2013, 02:07:02 PM
I personally think its about time the icw3 just ends... before we all want to kill each other...

I support that!!

Quote from: engelskrieger on September 29, 2013, 02:31:04 PM
I support that!!

Many ppl do, thats why i asked oven to add a poll asking if we want icw to finish (if im not wrong he will post it in next icw thread

I don't even think we should bother playing any rounds next week. It be best just to finally end it. Week 7 is a good ending to the ICW3.

Yeah maybe it should end. But how about one last round. Make it the best round yet. One grand finale :D Several things could be changed. Maybe up the attacks so everyone has 3 attacks?Maybe that's too much. But I don't want the ICW's last week to end with as many problems as this one has.

I thikk its enough with just 3 wars.
212 picks sides and everything on 1, and 1.0 picks sides and everything on another one.
In case of draw, Oven can just choose a map and will randomly assign each clan 1 side.
I find this fair.

I think it should just end how it is. We all will probably get into a way bigger argument anyways. And its best to leave it as it is now so it wont be as bad.
Plus 212 has like all European players... I could hardly move on our Arena match.
I don't think it be very fun playing on laggy servers...

I'm sorry I missed this weekends games, as I try to be there so as many people who want to play can play, but I have a ridiculous workload this week not to mention being on that jobs grind.

Most people we lagging I think. Particularly at the start I had some hardcore lagg ;)

@Hond
The lag is a problem. American players had lags but European didn't. That was the first icw war I had with no lag. It is a "continental" problem

Quote from: Kniescheibenzerschredderer on September 29, 2013, 03:36:16 PM
I thikk its enough with just 3 wars.
212 picks sides and everything on 1, and 1.0 picks sides and everything on another one.
In case of draw, Oven can just choose a map and will randomly assign each clan 1 side.
I find this fair.

I like Anyders idea, give each team one last hoorah.

Quote from: -=(212) Nixo=- on September 29, 2013, 04:30:40 PM
Most people we lagging I think. Particularly at the start I had some hardcore lagg ;)

Those lags came cause i was connected everytime to the root, just in case i had to kick someone cause of killing after warning x50 times to not kill.

EDIT:

Quote from: {212th} Ldr. Norris on September 30, 2013, 06:04:50 AM
I like Anyders idea, give each team one last hoorah.

Lol, please: u like Kniescheibenzerschredderer's idea =D

How about for next week we create 2 new clans just for the weekend. We could just do like 4 battles, 2 on Saturday, 2 on Sunday. Maybe have the members randomly chosen or have a person choose the members for each clan.

I preper my idea.
So that later awards can be correctly assigned.

I like the idea of one last battle each. With 3 clans we can all play each other. We should all pick a map each that we enjoy and have random sides. Maybe even play both sides each in case the first time ends really quickly. ;)
I thing Stings idea is a good one for the future but that's for another time.

Well gdh, i mean to do a 212 vs 1.0
Mainly cause we have most maps --> Planets left: 1.0 = 9     212 = 7    YAK = 2
I hope nixo has updated that in case it was needed lol

Quote from: vansting on September 30, 2013, 10:55:36 AM
How about for next week we create 2 new clans just for the weekend. We could just do like 4 battles, 2 on Saturday, 2 on Sunday. Maybe have the members randomly chosen or have a person choose the members for each clan.

(people from 1.0, 212 and yak split up into those 2 temporary clans)  GDH's idea is better.

Quote from: Kniescheibenzerschredderer on September 30, 2013, 11:44:35 AM
Well gdh, i mean to do a 212 vs 1.0
Mainly cause we have most maps --> Planets left: 1.0 = 9     212 = 7    YAK = 2
I hope nixo has updated that in case it was needed lol

Updated what? Those are the figures of last week so I haven't changed a think if that is what you are talking about.
@Hond, if we carry on any more battles in european servers it won't be as laggy for you, as Anyder explained what the problem was. But that is how it is for most Europeans in American servers.
@Van Sting, your idea is a fun one however it would completely change what the ICW is and has been. I would suggest leaving that for another sort of 'tournament'.

Can the leaders of the three clans post their official opinion on whether the tournament should end now?

If there's a dissenting voice, I don't think it would be fair to end it just yet.

If we decide to end, we can discuss what to do next week.

No need to rush, you can talk with your clan mates about it.

-----------------------------------

I would like to point out that once the ICW ends, the ICA can still be picked up as before. The ICA is lower-maintenance that the ICW, in fact, requires no maintenance at all ideally. In other words, large (or small), fun battles can still happen on a regular basis.

In fact, we could even change the ICA to reflect some of the good ideas that have been raised in this thread.

Quote from: Oven on September 30, 2013, 02:10:42 PM

I would like to point out that once the ICW ends, the ICA can still be picked up as before. The ICA is lower-maintenance that the ICW, in fact, requires no maintenance at all ideally. In other words, large (or small), fun battles can still happen on a regular basis.

In fact, we could even change the ICA to reflect some of the good ideas that have been raised in this thread.

I second that. I think its ok to keep having fws after ICW3 ends.
But, just wondering, will any ICA rule change ?

I would prefer the ICW3 to end now personally and we could have Funwars starting this weekend for fun. I really don't want to bother with any problems whether it be Majesty(Not YAKS fault), Lag, Mercs, Fakes, Jets, or anything because it has upset me very deeply. What if another week 4 happens? What if we all start pointing fingers at each other? It would be a much happier ending the ICW3 at a good note with no one losing planets and defending their homelands.

We should still have weekly fun wars. Start the ICA for this weekend. It will hopefully be less intense and probably way more enjoyable. I've only had head aches ever since week 4.

I understand 1.0 has more planets and I can understand 212 for wanting to do more. This is their 3rd time in it? I'd say go for a tie and award both clans for even a happier ending. (Plus it be nice if some people other then FC for once to have a winning medal)(No offense to FC because there are some great members in it)

I say End the ICW3. 

I say that we should end it now.  This weekend should start something new, like the ICA or Leaderboards.  Or even a 2 on 2 tourney or a giant battle with all the participants.  We could probably fit 50 people in one server...  8)

Some YAK players have expressed interest in continuing the tournament. They can voice their individual opinions here if they want.

Personally, I don't have a preference. If it continues I will still try to show up at matches. If it is discontinued than oh well less of a headache. I honestly just want to play. I don't really care if it's in tournaments, fun wars, or just regular servers. My time to play these days is limited, so I like to have fun when I play. And the activity in Battlefront will only be going down so let's make the most of it while we can.

we have ICA for that

Ya we have ICA but whats the problem of doing it here,lets just play have fun and stop arguing every battle.Its amazing how many arguing this small community can make compared to many others i know/im part of.
An idea to a possible next tournament: Why not split the people that want to play into random teams? Make sure each team have the same number of  europeans/americans/begginers/pros...

The YAK that responded seemed to want more games. I would personally want one more week just to finish things off (we had to work hard to stay in). I do think that we need to bring it to an end soon though or at least change some things.
I actually didn't think much went wrong last week apart from Majesty but I do miss playing on public servers now and they are seeing less people because everyone is in ICW password servers.

Quote from: {PLA}gdh92 on October 02, 2013, 09:30:45 AM
The YAK that responded seemed to want more games. I would personally want one more week just to finish things off (we had to work hard to stay in). I do think that we need to bring it to an end soon though or at least change some things.
I actually didn't think much went wrong last week apart from Majesty but I do miss playing on public servers now and they are seeing less people because everyone is in ICW password servers.

So last week then...

Quote from: Disciple on October 01, 2013, 01:00:51 PM
Ya we have ICA but whats the problem of doing it here,lets just play have fun and stop arguing every battle.Its amazing how many arguing this small community can make compared to many others i know/im part of.
An idea to a possible next tournament: Why not split the people that want to play into random teams? Make sure each team have the same number of  europeans/americans/begginers/pros...

I agree that should be the next tournament. I'd enjoy a "pick-up" swbf game.

You could start the ICA this week, or even possibly take a break this weekend. Make the week after more intense for the last week of the ICW3 if there is to be one.

Its already Wednesday and there is lots of talk about many ideas (some really good ones too). I suggest we skip this weekend anyways whether people think its a good time to end it now or 1 more. Gives some people time to relax and do something else, or to get caught up in school. And think about this more through.

Quote from: Gen.Hond{snp} on October 02, 2013, 02:00:02 PM
Its already Wednesday and there is lots of talk about many ideas (some really good ones too). I suggest we skip this weekend anyways whether people think its a good time to end it now or 1 more. Gives some people time to relax and do something else, or to get caught up in school. And think about this more through.

I agree. Let's take a breather this weekend. Next week is my fall break, so I won't be quite so busy as I have been. If YAK wants to continue another week after this, then that's probably what we'll do.

We can still set up some fun wars this weekend, if people are interested.

Perhaps we can plan on:
2 maps, at 2 and 3 EST on Saturday
2 maps, at 2 ans 3 EST on Sunday

No password, auto-assign, etc. Anyone may play but you must obey the rules of conduct or else be banned.

I'll add a poll where we can pick which 2+2=4 maps we will play.

----------------------
I think someone asked whether the ICA rules would be changed. I honestly don't remember them, but  yes, I think that we'll just start from scratch and have a community-brainstormed rewrite of the ICA rules. Bear in mind that the only "rules" for the ICA were rules on organization: the actual rules of battle were open-ended as long as both teams could agree. 

In my opinion, 212 just want the tourney to go on cause they think they can get maps.
Well, we can just see that in 1.0 vs 212 funwars to decide the winner.
After this, we can just continue playing ICA.

Yes, of course we want planets, as I am almost positive all teams do :P However that is not my reason to carry on. I wanted to carry on in the previous ICW's despite us loosing. I like the planet system and I find it a lot more fun playing for an aim. In this case playing for planets. It is also a nice way for a team to "gel". The ICW is a lot more competitive to say the least and I like that, until it gets out of hand like with Harbour... It also encourages me to play swbf. I try to participate in as many tournaments as I can to keep me playing actively. The ICA is still fun but I just do not enjoy it as much.

So why dont we end ICW3 and start ICW4 ?

Haha xD Why would you do that but not carry on this ICW? The only difference is you'd be starting for scratch.

Quote from: -=(212) Nixo=- on October 03, 2013, 12:40:41 PM
Haha xD Why would you do that but not carry on this ICW? The only difference is you'd be starting for scratch.

Why ''Haha '' ?
this ICW has too many bans and only 3 teams.
Maybe in next ICW more clans wanna participate.. and also change maps

Because I find it funny how a 3 can be followed by a 4 so quickly. But I see your logic, however I would leave a little gap of time, say a month at the very least. You saw that 5 clans started out. Let's say 4 because of the TcF "issue". En'ten did well. But which other clans would take part? I am not sure it would grow at all. Also, to put this out there ;), no ICW has been "finished". One clan owns all planets.

Quote from: -=(212) Nixo=- on October 03, 2013, 01:14:01 PM
Also, to put this out there ;), no ICW has been "finished". One clan owns all planets.

Actually I believe FC won all the planets in the first ICW. Just throwing that out there ;)

As i remember no clan owned more than 75% of the map. It ended then.
Anyway its been 2 months and this was supposed to be summer ICW.
No offence but its not my prob if admins made it start 2 late..
If Oven agrees then we can just play funwars as ICA with ICW maps.
Whoever wants to play, they can just post like an ICW attack.

I don't remember that, SipPimped(Sorry Elite - I only glanced at the blue profle pic) :o Prove it to me :D

• NVM I was proved wrong

[/color]

Quote from: -=(212) Nixo=- on October 03, 2013, 02:09:31 PM
I don't remember that, Elite :o Prove it to me :D

Huh? Prove what?

Anyder has a point about the Summer reason. We should of stopped like two weeks ago if it was suppose to be a summer thing. I would say end it now still and start the ICA.
Plus whats the fun in playing European servers if the Americans lag and If Europeans lag on American servers. I don't really find them like legit battles because you will never get the full potential from both teams. Which personally made the YAK vs 1.0 games more fun for me.

I also could Argue the Arena match was on Anyder's server (which he isn't suppose to host anymore servers) with the 200+ or 300+ pings almost everyone from 1.0 had. But I'm being lenient about it anyways even know I would love to argue about it.

Plus school/jobs/activities/groups/homework/events and etc are starting to affect some of us.
212 might want to keep playing but the 1.0 battles are going to start shrinking (no more 10v10s which ruins the purpose of the ICW3).

If you start the ICA soon which will auto assign teams there should be enough players still.
Also if there is a week 8 I really really don't want to put up with any nonsense. Which is likely to happen.

Ps Elite I think he meant SirPimped

Root has 120Mbps download and 100Mbps upload speed, so i guess high pings come from american's bad inet -.-
I had 80 ping, and i havee 50Mbps inet...
Ps. All euros had great ping, .. guess americans need more than the normal 10Mbps or like hond's inet (u know what i mean ;) )

Quote from: Kniescheibenzerschredderer on October 03, 2013, 01:52:31 PM
As i remember no clan owned more than 75% of the map. It ended then.

Oven's post about the first ICW:

Quote from: Oven on September 10, 2012, 09:47:18 AM
I will use this thread as a conclusion for the first Intergalactic Clan War.

First of all, congratulations to the Freelancer Consortium for not only winning the ICW, but doing so in fine style — by capturing every single planet on the map and thereby eliminating every other participating clan. It was a pleasure watching you guys play.

Quote from: Kniescheibenzerschredderer on October 03, 2013, 03:21:23 PM
Root has 120Mbps download and 100Mbps upload speed, so i guess high pings come from american's bad inet -.-
I had 80 ping, and i havee 50Mbps inet...
Ps. All euros had great ping, .. guess americans need more than the normal 10Mbps or like hond's inet (u know what i mean ;) )

Yes because your servers are from Europe. Making Europeans have good connection. And I'm not going to pay the crazy amount you do just to get good connection.

Anyder's server would have been acceptable even though US players had high ping except for the fact that his was in the server and lagging everyone  ;)

Quote
3. Anyder is no longer allowed to host official tournament servers. This is because he wrongfully closed the Harbor server because he was upset about an enemy jet (who was a clan-faker/saboteur) and what he perceived as "hacking" (using tanks on the mountains -- this is completely OK).

According since week 3 Led :P

can all my votes be for platforms?

I do not understand that Led. Anyway i think americans are used to have 90 ping as much and they just dislike euro server. If what u mean its self host that would make laugh a lot.

can we add Ord Mantell map for future icw tournements...?

Guys, I don't see the point why you still talk about the "European/American Server Lags" You can't prevent that thing. The only possibility I see to prevent that is to differ the tournament to an europe and an american tournament and I dont think that anybody would like this. And Hond, you are right with "I am not going to pay for a crazy connection." But we can't solve this problem, except if we find a host where everyone lags :P And that it is unfair. True, thats why i prefered the ESL rules in this case. For those who don't know them: Each team chooses a planet and an era for their planet. Each map will be played Two times (each team play both sides). And you can choose the server for your map and the opponent for their map. And i'd like to propose that we may make a tournament like the ESL instead of another Tournament like the ICW.

Quote from: Dirty Harry on October 04, 2013, 09:41:11 AM
can we add Ord Mantell map for future icw tournements...?

We should have a SWBFgamers.com Ord Mantell night, it would be running for everyone's time zones. :)

Quote from: Kniescheibenzerschredderer on October 03, 2013, 10:38:37 PM
I do not understand that Led. Anyway i think americans are used to have 90 ping as much and they just dislike euro server. If what u mean its self host that would make laugh a lot.

You said you were in your server looking for Majesty to show up to ban them.  That causes lag on a server.  I have played on servers hosted all over.  I know about what I write.  I am not writing about issues due to high ping.

Quote from: Dirty Harry on October 04, 2013, 09:41:11 AM
can we add Ord Mantell map for future icw tournements...?

This map can be really fun and epic -- as long as there's a ton of people playing. Otherwise, it's quite a drag.

well, that was on arena match, and as i know u didnt play on that one.
I was everytime connected in buffer maps cause i was kicking those who wanted to kill.
After i disconnected as i know there were no lags.

Today we'll play:

Tranquaan - 2 EST
Mustafar    - 3 EST

It's open to the public so spread the word! I should be there.

okay I will be there

Tomorrow, we'll do:

Citadel - 2 EST
Dantooine - 3 EST

We do not mind if the ICW carries on or not, however we are slightly in favor that it does.

We are going to have a final week for the ICW. I'll post the Week 8 thread later tonight.

And...I've been held up, so I will post it tomorrow early. Sorry!