Poll
Question:
Which numbers rule is best?
Option 1: Guaranteed 8, beyond that sides must be even
votes: 3
Option 2: Guaranteed 8, beyond that defender gets 2-man advantage
votes: 3
Option 3: Battles always even
votes: 2
Option 4: Defender cannot be outnumbered
votes: 8
Option 5: Other (explain)
votes: 2
ICW3 Official Map Pack Download (http://www.swbfgamers.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=1028)Rules and General Information (http://www.swbfgamers.com/index.php?topic=6931.0)
WEEK SIX MAP WILL GO HERE[spoiler][/spoiler]
Week 5 results
- 1.0 takes Dantooine from YAK
1.0 takes Mustafar from YAK - 212 takes Mos from YAK
212 defends Harbor from YAK
212 defends Arena from YAK - YAK defends Streets from 212
Remarks1. Rock the vote. ("Beyond that" means both teams have to fill up to 8, and then additional players may be added in accordance with the specified rule.)
2. I've decided to let 212 keep Mos Eisley and in exchange, just give YAK their attack back. This is primarily because I don't like rematches, they're invariably a pain. Also, that was largely my fault, I can't expect everyone to be up-to-date on the forum posts on an hourly basis.
Attacking clan: 1.0
Defending clan: YAK
Time: 3pm est Saturday
Planet: Degobah Swamps
Era: TBD
Side: TBD
Attacking clan: 1.0
Defending clan: YAK
Time: 4 pm est Saturday
Planet: Rhen var Citidal
Era: TBD
Side:TBD
We will be attacking Bespin and Streets.
Incase anyone is confused, Nixo means Bespin platforms.
Other:
After 8 the defending team CAN have UP TO a 2-man advantage. This would benefit the defending team and encourage both sides to bring as many as possible. But not give the defending team an overwhelming advantage with no guarantee of there possibly being even sides after they have reached 8.
A question - If the decision for the +2 rule guarantee, what would happen if D had 9 and A had 7/8. How many could A bring?
Attacking Clan: 212
Defending Clan: YAK
Planet: Coruscant, Streets
Proposed day/time: Friday 5EST/11PM Berlin
Era/Side: GCW/Empire
Attacking Clan: 212
Defending Clan: Native
Planet: Bespin, Platforms
Proposed day/time: TBC (To be confirmed)
Era/Side: CW/CIS
Proposed day/time
Guess I should say since you said explain, I like nixo's idea! Indeed it was what I thought of as a good idea in my mind. 8)
Quote from: -=(212) Nixo=- on September 17, 2013, 08:22:29 AM
Attacking Clan: 212
Defending Clan: Native
Planet: Bespin, Platforms
Proposed day/time: Saturday 2EST/8Berlin
Era/Side: CW/CIS
Proposed day/time
I wanna play some ICW3
Quote from: FieroBull on September 18, 2013, 02:24:48 PM
I wanna play some ICW3
If you wish to play, say so in your clan forum. Please and thank you.
:moo:
Nixo, would you be able to switch the native attack to Friday and the YAK attack on Saturday and just flip the times? I think most of our members would prefer games on Saturday/Sunday.
As a head's up, I won't be available this Saturday.
Should be good for Sunday, though.
Attacking Clan: 212
Defending Clan: YAK
Planet: Coruscant, Streets
Proposed day/time: Saturday 2EST
Era/Side: GCW/Empire
Attacking Clan: 212
Defending Clan: Native
Planet: Bespin, Platforms
Proposed day/time: Friday 2EST
Era/Side: CW/CIS
Proposed day/time
There are already battles on at the best times for us on Saturday, 3 and 4EST so we may need to switch it to Sunday unless 2 or 5 works.
Attacker: YAK
Defender: 1.0
Planet: Cloud City
Time: Saturday 1 EST
Side: Empire
Attacker: YAK
Defender: 1.0
Planet: Dantooine
Time: Sunday 2 EST
Side: Empire
Oven, do u mind adding ALL matches to the first post of this topic ¿
Quote from: SirPimped on September 19, 2013, 11:33:03 AM
Attacker: YAK
Defender: 1.0
Planet: Cloud City
Time: Saturday 1 EST
Side: Empire
Attacker: YAK
Defender: 1.0
Planet: Dantooine
Time: Sunday 2 EST
Side: Empire
Why so early? There are nice open slots for 3-5 EST on Sunday that we didn't take this time. We couldn't make the last 2 EST battle last weekend and I don't feel like having a bunch of YAK players wait for us because we are not up right away on a computer. So can we get those battles during those times? I don't care which but those times are way to early.
Also Birdo wants me to argue this rule.
"The attacks must be scheduled by Wednesday at midnight EST. The battles must be scheduled for some time on Friday, Saturday, or Sunday. Because there is a strong mix of both American and European players, the following rule will be enforced if needed: Defenders can reject a certain battle time and counter with a time which is more convenient for them. "
If your going to argue don't tell me your argument. Reply to Birdo because he wouldn't shut up about it while I already know what the answer will most likely will be.
Yeah the rule was broken, we have posted are attacks on Thursday twice maybe three times before, but have given warning in advance. And this was only because of timezones, the l
Fortunately this does not affect us but more warning would be appreciated as we have to edit the site and forums ect. Just next time try to give some warning if possible.
The latest we can move it to 3 EST on Sunday. Does that work?
Quote from: SirPimped on September 19, 2013, 02:17:29 PM
The latest we can move it to 3 EST on Sunday. Does that work?
Note: It's fine to post which planets you're attacking first, as long as you meet the deadline below for officially scheduling.
The attacks must be scheduled by Wednesday at midnight EST. The battles must be scheduled for some time on Friday, Saturday, or Sunday. Because there is a strong mix of both American and European players, the following rule will be enforced if needed: Defenders can reject a certain battle time and counter with a time which is more convenient for them.
The rule in the paragraph just above should not be abused by defenders. I'm relying on participants to understand what abuse means here. If the rule is abused then it will be removed and scheduling will be a free-for-all. The goal should be to have both teams as full as possible.
Quote from: hellish hellbird on September 19, 2013, 02:23:31 PM
Note: It's fine to post which planets you're attacking first, as long as you meet the deadline below for officially scheduling.
The attacks must be scheduled by Wednesday at midnight EST. The battles must be scheduled for some time on Friday, Saturday, or Sunday. Because there is a strong mix of both American and European players, the following rule will be enforced if needed: Defenders can reject a certain battle time and counter with a time which is more convenient for them.
The rule in the paragraph just above should not be abused by defenders. I'm relying on participants to understand what abuse means here. If the rule is abused then it will be removed and scheduling will be a free-for-all. The goal should be to have both teams as full as possible.
Good for you. Do you want us to withdraw our attacks? Would you like to have us penalized? Please state what punishments you would like to see done. I would like to remind you that 1.0 and 212 have broken this rule before as well with no action taken.
Quote from: SirPimped on September 19, 2013, 04:17:06 PM
Good for you. Do you want us to withdraw our attacks? Would you like to have us penalized? Please state what punishments you would like to see done. I would like to remind you that 1.0 and 212 have broken this rule before as well with no action taken.
Yes.No.refer to the first answer. And its your fault for not calling it then and it seems nixo said they gave a warning prior if that did happen which you did not.
Stop the arguing. We've all sent in late attacks at this point in the tournament.
Quote from: Dark_Phantom on September 19, 2013, 04:44:41 PM
Stop the arguing. We've all sent in late attacks at this point in the tournament.
Not arguing...im saying the dates were setup past the due date and in regards to if they did that before 1.0 212 or yak or enten or uef noone called it out so why is that a valid point? were calling it now so....plus i came in on the fabled 4th week so im not well informed on those possible late attacks but according to nixo they apperently gave a warning and again noone called them out for it so
I'll let it slide, because (a) it's happened before, and YAK has usually been very prompt about their attacks and (more personally) (b) I am or was technically the YAK representative, and I just plain forgot to read the YAK forums and post the attack. (Sorry about that, YAK)
Quote from: hellish hellbird on September 19, 2013, 04:32:02 PM
Yes.No.refer to the first answer. And its your fault for not calling it then and it seems nixo said they gave a warning prior if that did happen which you did not.
Nixo himself missed the attack in week 4. We didn't "call" him on it because we are an understanding bunch and we like to play SWBF.
Quote from: Oven on September 19, 2013, 04:58:04 PM
I'll let it slide, because (a) it's happened before, and YAK has usually been very prompt about their attacks and (more personally) (b) I am or was technically the YAK representative, and I just plain forgot to read the YAK forums and post the attack. (Sorry about that, YAK)
Democracy ensues HEAR HEAR :cheers:
No I don't mind YAK putting a late attack in for this week or any week. It was only delayed by less then a day. If it was Friday I would be a bit more upset but that isn't the case. We can forgive YAK because they have been having hard times with members anyways. I knew the answer to this anyways Oven lol.
SP we can do one on 3 pm EST on Sunday. Maybe have the other one at 5 EST on Sat? Hurry and reply before the Birdo inspector arrives.
Phantom no need to lock this topic >.< Its not like pages and pages of nonsense.
Quote from: Gen.Hond{snp} on September 19, 2013, 08:20:10 PM
SP we can do one on 3 pm EST on Sunday. Maybe have the other one at 5 EST on Sat? Hurry and reply before the Birdo inspector arrives.
I'll propose the new time to the YAK members, but we do have some players who requested earlier times so they could play.
.
Quote from: BlackScorpion on September 18, 2013, 06:41:45 PM
As a head's up, I won't be available this Saturday.
Should be good for Sunday, though.
Great; I should be available on Sat. but not Sun, like last week.
As for today, I can't make the Platforms battle at 2EST (I did set up the server though). Anyone else got it?
I'll admin Platforms if it's ok with everyone.
212 takes Platforms.
212 takes platforms
gg
[spoiler]
(https://www.swbfgamers.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-M2nkoNgW-s4%2FUjyRkYEf6dI%2FAAAAAAAAAVc%2Fdp4rY6qSvks%2Fs1600%2Fplatforms.png&hash=cc8ddb1e269b06aef7bc801c0e1f4d67350afaae)
[/spoiler]
Almost forgot about the era and sides
Both GCW
Rebels on Dego
Empire on Cit
ok our attack will be moved to 5 EST instead of 1 EST. I hope we can get enough members :confused:
So the plan for today is:
2EST: 212/YAK/Streets
3EST: 1.0/YAK/Dagobah
4EST: 1.0/YAK/Citadel
5EST: YAK/1.0/CC
Right?
Quote from: Oven on September 21, 2013, 08:10:43 AM
So the plan for today is:
2EST: 212/YAK/Streets
3EST: 1.0/YAK/Dagobah
4EST: 1.0/YAK/Citadel
5EST: YAK/1.0/CC
Right?
As far as I know, yes.
Looks correct to me
I can't update our public members list but RC-54 has joined YAK and Paksu Pepe is already in YAK but not on the list yet. Just posting now to avoid any merc arguments later. :)
I guess we're reverting to the original sides rule: the defender cannot be outnumbered. I'm not 100% convinced this is the best rule, but it's not awful, and I put it up to a vote and it's the clear winner so we'll stick with democracy.
yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay democracies and republics i knew there was a reason i payed attention in social studies in 6th grade :tu:
Please do not post entirely in ALL CAPs, it's loathsome. - UNIT 33
Quote from: {TCE}Call-of-Duty on September 21, 2013, 10:55:21 AM
yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay democracies and republics i knew there was a reason i payed attention in social studies in 6th grade :tu:
Please do not post entirely in ALL CAPs, it's loathsome. - UNIT 33
We had social studies in 6th grade? Guess I should pay some more attention.. :wacko:
Thats one of the 'Sortaneat-sortanot' things about all tournaments. Lots and lots of politics.
212 takes Streets, GG.
[spoiler](https://www.swbfgamers.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fg219T2N.jpg&hash=fc7953124680163be9450d83956ecc1c5fc39e44)[/spoiler]
YAK defends Dagobah, GG.
[spoiler](https://www.swbfgamers.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FQBkpSBX.jpg&hash=545efac236c2729b8ca9777a410be467859a8e85)[/spoiler]
For people complaining about Majesty, xfire has a very nice block feature that I recommend.
I don't think it's a good idea to be the lead admin of a tournament and in two anti 212 communitys at the same time, jseoph.
Quote from: Ten Numb on September 21, 2013, 01:39:00 PM
I don't think it's a good idea to be the lead admin of a tournament and in two anti 212 communitys at the same time, jseoph.
I agree, I've left. But they're pretty much meaningless anyway :)
Quote from: Ten Numb on September 21, 2013, 01:39:00 PM
I don't think it's a good idea to be the lead admin of a tournament and in two anti 212 communitys at the same time, jseoph.
I dont think its a good idea to complain to a head admin, Mart
1.0 took Citadel, GG.
[spoiler](https://www.swbfgamers.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FDfC6Tdt.jpg&hash=e4ff9ba85fda82a277381cbe79aac22488784843)[/spoiler]
Quote from: Helios on September 21, 2013, 01:43:47 PM
I dont think its a good idea to complain to a head admin, Mart
That's the exact opposite of the truth, Helios. I have always encouraged complaints, criticism, comments, questions, etc. It's one of the foundational ideas of the ICW.
Quote from: Ten Numb on September 21, 2013, 01:39:00 PM
I don't think it's a good idea to be the lead admin of a tournament and in two anti 212 communitys at the same time, jseoph.
Maybe not, but tbf he has done a "fair" job.
Quote from: Helios on September 21, 2013, 01:43:47 PM
I dont think its a good idea to complain to a head admin, Mart
But he has a valid point.
1.0 take Citadel. I have a video but I only want to upload it if it is needed as proof.
I was right, so I don't see the problem. I just thought it was bad manners to be in a hate community of a clan that is in the ICW, and be the head un biased admin. Thanks anyway, Joseph.
Mart was completely right, and there's no problem. The end.
Nixo, you don't need to upload. I've been deleting the videos once I'm sure that there was no problem with the game, since they take up so much space.
1.0 defends CC
[spoiler]
(https://www.swbfgamers.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmemberfiles.freewebs.com%2F78%2F50%2F75505078%2Fphotos%2Fundefined%2Feasy%2520win.png&hash=e1549e28b7169d461e3275c2d6de13c96bbc8f55)
[/spoiler]
I've seen 212 winning 3 times today... Am I going blind? I thought citadel was attacked by 1.0 and cc defended by 1.0
And 1.0 defends CC. GG
Good job today guys.
My internet turned off then my mouse, sorry.
1.0 controls CC..
212 had one battle today. 1.0 three.
Quote from: Ten Numb on September 21, 2013, 02:19:06 PM
I've seen 212 winning 3 times today... Am I going blind?
Yes cause, there were 2 1.0 matches today and only 1 212 match lol
Did the Dantooine battle tomorrow get moved to 3EST, or is it still 2?
Quote from: Oven on September 21, 2013, 02:30:14 PM
Did the Dantooine battle tomorrow get moved to 3EST, or is it still 2?
3 EST. We had asked it to be moved to. As you were able to see we were able to get more members later in the day. If it was 2 there would only be a few of us.
Quote from: Gen.Hond{snp} on September 21, 2013, 04:48:25 PM
3 EST. We had asked it to be moved to. As you were able to see we were able to get more members later in the day. If it was 2 there would only be a few of us.
OK. Scorpion should be the admin.
PSA: I received a PM on xfire an hour ago, but I can't access it or see who sent it. So, try again with a different method (essentially anything but xfire PM).
It was moved to 3 EST, but as you can see we have less members later in the day so I guess it should be interesting.
Quote from: Oven on September 21, 2013, 05:33:22 PM
PSA: I received a PM on xfire an hour ago, but I can't access it or see who sent it. So, try again with a different method (essentially anything but xfire PM).
If you mean in X-fire chat and have the same glitch as me, when you hear a message you have to open a chat box to whoever you think its from and their message will show up. That's why I'm often late responding to people.
That doesn't help much now though. :)
I find it funny how phobos quotes stuff from this thread, and answers them in past ICW3 threads
lol.
Quote from: Ten Numb on September 22, 2013, 08:33:01 AM
I find it funny how phobos quotes stuff from this thread, and answers them in past ICW3 threads
lol.
i find it funny that you dig thru all my posts lol
yep, looking through icw3 threads to find total win totals, I'm such a stalker.
GG's today.
Except for anyone in this community http://www.xfire.com/communities/antijosephcommunity
Just when you thought someone couldn't get any more low then that. They bring it to another Level.
Or this one http://www.xfire.com/communities/antitcf
Or this one http://www.xfire.com/communities/212sucks
Or this one http://www.xfire.com/communities/anti212
And Also this one http://www.xfire.com/communities/antiplatacommunity
Don't forget this one http://www.xfire.com/communities/antishazamcommunity
Who ruins this game again?
Quote from: Gen.Hond{snp} on September 22, 2013, 07:48:33 PM
GG's today.
Except for anyone in this community http://www.xfire.com/communities/antijosephcommunity
Just when you thought someone couldn't get any more low then that. They bring it to another Level.
And they say WE actively kill the community i bet if all anti-whatever groups were put together there would be a consistent member of all the groups leading them
Or this one http://classic.xfire.com/communities/antifc/
Or this one http://www.xfire.com/communities/fcsucks
Or these http://classic.xfire.com/communities_search/?q=antifc
If you're going to pick out all the hateful communities, don't leave out the ones made by your friends.
Quote from: SirPimped on September 22, 2013, 10:28:11 PM
Or this one http://classic.xfire.com/communities/antifc/
Or this one http://www.xfire.com/communities/fcsucks
Or these http://classic.xfire.com/communities_search/?q=antifc
If you're going to pick out all the hateful communities, don't leave out the ones made by your friends.
You forget who created what groups first pimped. and you neglect to look at those groups are headed by several different people as opposed to all the other ones being lead by one person :o
Quote from: hellish hellbird on September 22, 2013, 08:10:07 PM
And they say WE actively kill the community
that is correct your hate-FC group do not contribute anything to the community, but you're always eager to start more drama on the forums here.
Quote from: Gen.Hond{snp} on September 22, 2013, 07:48:33 PM
GG's today.
Except for anyone in this community http://www.xfire.com/communities/antijosephcommunity
Just when you thought someone couldn't get any more low then that. They bring it to another Level.
Or this one http://www.xfire.com/communities/antitcf
Or this one http://www.xfire.com/communities/212sucks
Or this one http://www.xfire.com/communities/anti212
And Also this one http://www.xfire.com/communities/antiplatacommunity
Don't forget this one http://www.xfire.com/communities/antishazamcommunity
Who ruins this game again?
Quote from: hellish hellbird on September 23, 2013, 12:12:47 AM
You forget who created what groups first pimped. and you neglect to look at those groups are headed by several different people as opposed to all the other ones being lead by one person :o
As low as you are it's not a surprise that all of the anti FC groups were started first before all the others (hence the per-hater base) and you just keep up the trolling on this forum, consistently derailing threads like this because your that obsessed with trolling us. Just when we thought hond could not go lower he does. Your desperate obsession with stalking and continued trolling of FC on these forums long after everyone else gave up is rather sad.
I joined one of the anti fc communities after you created the anti 212 communities. Also, I see why people would join an anti fc community, pretty rude that you get cursed at and booted the first time you ever join a fc server. Keep lying, yes you did create ANOTHER anti 212 group after I joined anti fc group. Ahhh good think no one else will have to experience that since fc servers are locked! :DD
Quote from: Ten Numb on September 23, 2013, 03:38:53 AM
I joined one of the anti fc communities after you created the anti 212 communities. Also, I see why people would join an anti fc community, pretty rude that you get cursed at and booted the first time you ever join a fc server. Keep lying, yes you did create ANOTHER anti 212 group after I joined anti fc group. Ahhh good think no one else will have to experience that since fc servers are locked! :DD
Pretty rude of you to crash our servers, and team stun players on our team (as kishan pointed out) and expect not to get booted, and it was either you or shazam (or wusi kags) who started the first anti fc community, so the others were made as a result of that. So keep lying and starting up more conflict. You started it on xfire communities, and then started it again here on this thread.
Regardless, your obsession with trolling FC and our responses to that level of hate really has nothing to do with the ICW3, but I can see you're running out of ideas to start more arguments with FC on these forums so you're really reaching at this point for anything you can to stir up more drama here.
Quote from: Ten Numb on September 23, 2013, 03:38:53 AM
Ahhh good think no one else will have to experience that since fc servers are locked! :DD
Purpose fulfilled, locking our servers keeps out the noobs and the crashers.
Mhm, that was the first time I had entered fc server, and I've never tked kishan in fc server, maybe in others, and I've never crashed fc server, I'm tired of you lying. Why would I tk kishan? Then my tunngle name would be discovered, tked=owned to kishan.
Quote from: Ten Numb on September 23, 2013, 03:51:49 AM
Mhm, that was the first time I had entered fc server, and I've never tked kishan in fc server, maybe in others, and I've never crashed fc server, I'm tired of you lying. Why would I tk kishan? Then my tunngle name would be discovered, tked=owned to kishan.
im tired of you lying and starting more thread-derailing conflicts, you crashed our servers alot and namefaked us alot, and tked us. you were banned from our servers for many good reasons so move on already.
Quote from: Phobos on September 23, 2013, 03:22:59 AM
that is correct your hate-FC group do not contribute anything to the community, but you're always eager to start more drama on the forums here.
As low as you are it's not a surprise that all of the anti FC groups were started first before all the others (hence the per-hater base) and you just keep up the trolling on this forum, consistently derailing threads like this because your that obsessed with trolling us. Just when we thought hond could not go lower he does. Your desperate obsession with stalking and continued trolling of FC on these forums long after everyone else gave up is rather sad.
well actually i didnt join nor make those groups so what you said by your hate groups is inaccurate as its not my group...lets see where do i go from here...umm ok. you are the one whos changing your posts in older threads which i didnt know until ten said something....uhhh....ok lets go into a history lesson here....back when rich was like the crazy leader he created FC after antiwusi died for the same effect so essentially FC is the biproduct of a anti something group which rich and beta made for sharpening our boys back in like 2007 or whatever...and ya i agree that the group thing kinda derailed it but again....hond posted it not me so....infact all i said were words not links....ummm....i think its weird how you like to copy what someone says...oh and you know what else i just realized? We didnt even name names on who created these groups but you get offended by it...why?
Good job locking fc servers, better keep them that way :cheer:
Quote from: Ten Numb on September 23, 2013, 03:56:36 AM
Good job locking fc servers, better keep them that way :cheer:
yeah i know you've said 1000 times you will crash them the second they aren't locked, but we enjoy the game much more with them locked so thanks we will keep them that way :) (at least our clan has dedicated servers lol)
Quote from: hellish hellbird on September 23, 2013, 03:53:19 AM
well actually i didnt join nor make those groups so what you said by your hate groups is inaccurate as its not my group...lets see where do i go from here...umm ok. you are the one whos changing your posts in older threads which i didnt know until ten said something....uhhh....ok lets go into a history lesson here....back when rich was like the crazy leader he created FC after antiwusi died for the same effect so essentially FC is the biproduct of a anti something group which rich and beta made for sharpening our boys back in like 2007 or whatever...and ya i agree that the group thing kinda derailed it but again....hond posted it not me so....infact all i said were words not links....ummm....i think its weird how you like to copy what someone says...oh and you know what else i just realized? We didnt even name names on who created these groups but you get offended by it...why?
I wasnt saying you did i was talking about the others. i was referring to hond and mart's statements. thats funny you pretend rich made FC he didnt, beta did. Beta offered rich to join as a leader but he never did anything so that offer was revoked later. Also yeah there were names on them, FC is not a byproduct like WUSI is of WU. We are our own clan lol.
Quotewell actually i didnt join nor make those groups
QuoteWe didnt even name names on who created these groups but you get offended by it...why?
we?
Anyway I have an offer for all of you.
Quote from: hellish hellbird on September 23, 2013, 04:01:26 AM
thats odd http://www.freewebs.com/swbfthefc/retiredfcmembers.htm (http://www.freewebs.com/swbfthefc/retiredfcmembers.htm) i am dyslexic but it looks like it says...COfounder? and by we i mean hond and i. we never mentioned fc so why post here? if anything you stirred it up by posting here
interesting that looks like disinformation. colgreen most likely was misinformed and thought rich had actually contributed to FC although he didnt. anyway when i joined fc later in 2008 i never saw rich in game with fc tags only wusi. and actually i didnt stir this up, vixo you and hond did. one only has to look at the order of posts to see that.
Quote from: Phobos on September 23, 2013, 03:56:45 AM
yeah i know you've said 1000 times you will crash them the second they aren't locked, but we enjoy the game much more with them locked so thanks we will keep them that way :) (at least our clan has dedicated servers lol)
I wasnt saying you did i was talking about the others. i was referring to hond and mart's statements. thats funny you pretend rich made FC he didnt, beta did. Beta offered rich to join as a leader but he never did anything so that offer was revoked later. Also yeah there were names on them,
we?
thats odd http://www.freewebs.com/swbfthefc/retiredfcmembers.htm (http://www.freewebs.com/swbfthefc/retiredfcmembers.htm) i am dyslexic but it looks like it says...COfounder? and by we i mean hond and i. we never mentioned fc so why post here? if anything you stirred it up by posting here
Anymore crap not related to ICW3 and I shut it down.
Keep this kind of stuff off of this website.
If the ICW3 gets shut down and it continues, then I start banning from this website.
Take this seriously.
Quote from: Buckler on September 23, 2013, 04:03:27 AM
Anymore crap not related to ICW3 and I shut it down.
Keep this kind of stuff off of this website.
If the ICW3 gets shut down and it continues, then I start banning from this website.
Take this seriously.
Thanks. Anyone who wants to hear my conflict resolution idea just PM me.
By crap I mean no more trips down memory lane, no more links to anti-whoever communities, etc. Let the actions of the people that have created and joined such communities speak for themselves, and remember that I can not do anything about such off-site activities, childish and crap instigating as they are--and know that I understand that this is not the first such xfire "group".
I have had a lot of patience with a lot of members on this site, but it ends now.