SWBFGamers

Gaming for the Original SWBF1 and SWBF2/other games => SWBF 1 and 2 Tournaments => Topic started by: Oven on August 19, 2013, 06:21:36 PM

Title: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Oven on August 19, 2013, 06:21:36 PM
ICW3 Official Map Pack Download (http://www.swbfgamers.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=1028)

Rules and General Information (http://www.swbfgamers.com/index.php?topic=6931.0)

WEEK THREE MAP IS HERE
[spoiler](https://www.swbfgamers.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=6989.0;attach=2782;image)[/spoiler]

Week 2 Results:Important News:

1. 1.0 has been awarded Russia after all. I believe now that the evidence of foul play on the part of Enten is too great to ignore. The reason for my reversal was this: Anyder's screenshots were taken closer to the start time than I had mistakenly believed. Anyder and/or Hond first notified me of Anyder's discovery while Enten was still practicing in their server. But the screenshot was taken after they joined the game server, as Hond has pointed out and as I now remember.

Let's please try to put this behind us, regardless of what your opinion is. A penalty has been given (the harshest penalty that I would have given). Please (continue to) play fairly in the future. This tournament is supposed to be fun!

2. In light of the above, I need to reiterate that clans may declare non-members to be "acting members" for the sake of counting in the ICW3, as long as those non-members are also non-members of the other 3 participating clans. These "acting members" are counted as clan members in matches.

This has always been the implicit rule, and it has been followed from the very beginning of the ICW3, and in previous tournaments, in the case of 212. I can't regulate the internal structure of participating clans.

So this point means that if Enten did want to have the non-members you can see in their TS server counted as members, they would just need to notify me before a match. Basically, if the allegations are correct, they were entirely avoidable. It's the aroma of dishonesty that I find objectionable.

3. Anyder is no longer allowed to host official tournament servers. This is because he wrongfully closed the Harbor server because he was upset about an enemy jet (who was a clan-faker/saboteur) and what he perceived as "hacking" (using tanks on the mountains -- this is completely OK).

Beyond this, Anyder has posed as a 212 member in at least one match, and a 1.0 in another.

Beyond that, Anyder has cursed in games when he obviously knows that this is against the rules.

Beyond even that, Anyder has assaulted me with a ferocious onslaught of inane drivel over xfire, using profanities, slurs, and pipe-dream-like fabrications about me. I'm told that he has treated Enten with similar disrepect, even before the Russia debacle.

All of these are examples of wrong behavior.

Despite all this, I'm giving Anyder exactly one more chance to remain not-banned from the ICW3. If he breaks any more rules, he's completely banished for this and all future tournaments.

4. Despite the gravity of the first three points, this point is the most important. Basically, I'm not going to be able to attend matches like I have been. For planning purposes: I can't come to matches anymore. This will be true this weekend and most likely all the rest of the weeks.

This doesn't mean that:
It does mean that:
What kind of help?

Simple. Just show up to battles, and do like I do! Make sure the rules are obeyed, make sure to start the game as close to on-time as you can, make sure any questions are answered to the best of your knowledge, make sure to count-down if the map has no-bleed and start on reset otherwise, etc.

If you can play this role (and it doesn't matter which clan, if any, you're in) then please post here. It's not an obligation, it's not a contract, it's just telling me that you're willing to perform the simple duties in the preceding paragraph when you can. You can perform these duties and still play in the match, as long as you have my or Shazam's permission.

If you're interested in playing this role but have questions, comments, concerns, etc., send me a personal message here or talk to me on xfire.

My goal is to have at least one person from each clan, in addition to our present admins, who can help out with admin duties as needed.






   
Attacker (Side)DefenderMap (Era)Date/TimeConfirmed?Admin (Tentative)


   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Enten212MosFRI Noon/6Y
Enten212JabbaFRI 2/8Y
212EntenArenaFRI 3/9Y
212YAK MustafarSAT 2/8Y
YAK (Reb)EntenHarbor (GCW)SAT 3/9Y
YAKEntenStreetsSAT 4/10Y
1.0EntenTempleSUN 3/9
1.0EntenCCSUN 3:30/9:30
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Shazam on August 19, 2013, 06:29:34 PM
Unless my football game Saturday or my band rehearsal Sunday are canceled, I will not be able to admin or play this weekend. So, help is going to be needed this week for sure!

UPDATED

YAK's Attacks:

Attacking clan: YAK
Defending clan: En'Ten
Planet: Rhen Var: Harbour
YAK's side: Rebels
Day/time: Saturday, 3:00 PM EST

Attacking clan: YAK
Defending clan: En'Ten
Planet: Coruscant: Streets
YAK's side: Empire
Day/time: Saturday, 4:00 PM EST
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Anyder on August 20, 2013, 01:58:12 AM
No oven, i merc. for 212 just wijth a CoLead. rank. everybody knows im Ashley Purdy. Also for ur info. i joined 1.0 since im the leader of PRO Clan ive given myself Ldr in 1.0 too(some kind of rule hond made).
Ive not cursed ingame (if i have plz show it). But ill remind u, u said that stuff said before match didnt matter and saying owned, easy, pwnd, etc was allowed. I got this all in the conversation we had before u blocked me in xfire for telling u what i (as many other ppl) think of u. Also saying: "plz focus in game not only chat" is not cursing (?). Its for u to be able to see all the maps for not having problems like we did in cita.
Yea i lost completelt respect to ducks. (We already talked on that).
Which rule says something on bad behaviour ? ...
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: -=(212) Nixo=- on August 20, 2013, 02:23:58 AM
I think 212 will most likely attack Yavin Arena and mustafar.
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Unit 33 on August 20, 2013, 03:41:29 AM
Get yer steaming hot map here!
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Carpe Diem Jumper on August 20, 2013, 05:32:14 AM
1.0 receives Russia (https://www.swbfgamers.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.entenboard.de%2FWBB%2Fwcf%2Fimages%2Fsmilies%2Fmag_wallbash.gif&hash=9a7f73efaabaefd612171bdea2be84a09e306063) Never mind!

QuoteAttacking clan: YAK
Defending clan: En'Ten
Planet: Rhen Var: Harbour
YAK's side: Rebels
Day/time: Saturday, 3:00 PM EST

Attacking clan: YAK
Defending clan: En'Ten
Planet: Coruscant: Streets
YAK's side: TBD
Day/time: Saturday, 4:00 PM EST

Sorry but could we change the time for the match. I will ask some of my ducks  ;)
03:00 & 04:00pm isn't a good one
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: DEAGLE on August 20, 2013, 07:30:32 AM
Quote from: Ashley Purdy on August 20, 2013, 01:58:12 AMYea i lost completelt respect to ducks. (We already talked on that).

As if we would need respect from you. LOL


@YAK little bit later would be nice, about 3-4 hours probably. Is that possible?
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: RepComm on August 20, 2013, 09:13:21 AM
Nice job on the map Unit!
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Anyder on August 20, 2013, 09:27:25 AM
We ? u aint in entenclan, ure a mercenary.
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Oven on August 20, 2013, 10:48:02 AM
Quote from: Ashley Purdy on August 20, 2013, 09:27:25 AM
We ? u aint in entenclan, ure a mercenary.
Ur not an admin, ur a common troll. If Enten doesn't want Deagle speaking on their behalf then they can say so but I think it's already clear after two weeks that he can.

You're so close to being banned for good that I recommend you stay out of this thread.
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: -=(212) Nixo=- on August 20, 2013, 11:31:33 AM
Oven, how did Enten manage to take harbour off UEF? Didn't they already for the same reason 1.0 were given mygetto? And if not.. They would have had 3 attacks? Or am I just missing something  ;)
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Oven on August 20, 2013, 12:25:56 PM
Quote from: -=(212) Nixo=- on August 20, 2013, 11:31:33 AM
Oven, how did Enten manage to take harbour off UEF? Didn't they already for the same reason 1.0 were given mygetto? And if not.. They would have had 3 attacks? Or am I just missing something  ;)
I think my mistake was that Enten actually defended Harbor against UEF.
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: -=(212) Nixo=- on August 21, 2013, 12:56:43 AM
Ahh okay :p
Attacking clan: 212
Defending clan: YAK
Planet: Mustafar
Proposed time/date: Saturday 2Pm EST/8PM Berlin
Era/side: TBD

Attacking clan: 212
Defending clan: Enten
Planet: Yavin, Arena
Proposed time/date: Friday 3PM EST/9PM Berlin
Era/side: TBD
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Carpe Diem Jumper on August 21, 2013, 07:44:53 AM
Attacking clan: Enten
Defending clan: 212
Planet: Tatooine: Jabbas Palace
Proposed time/date: Friday 8PM Berlin time
Era/side: TBD

Attacking clan: Enten
Defending clan: 212
Planet: Tatooine: Mos Eisley
Proposed time/date: Friday 6PM Berlin time
Era/side: TBD

@YAK, sorry for the post (03:00 & 04:00pm isn't a good one).
Little mistake. I have the time zones mixed up :P 09.00 pm & 10:00pm Berlin Time, its ok ;)
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: -=(212) Nixo=- on August 21, 2013, 01:36:16 PM
The attacks are both accepted but could you change the 8pm one half an hour earlier to 7.30?
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Carpe Diem Jumper on August 21, 2013, 01:54:39 PM
QuoteThe attacks are both accepted but could you change the 8pm one half an hour earlier to 7.30?

k, no prob  ;)
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: -=(212) Nixo=- on August 22, 2013, 03:20:10 AM
Quote from: Carpe Diem Jumper on August 21, 2013, 01:54:39 PM
k, no prob  ;)
Or another idea is we can change our attack to 1PM EST on saturday? (7PM Berlin) If that is any easier.
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Carpe Diem Jumper on August 22, 2013, 05:56:20 AM
Hm, idk cause the first war is at 6pm. 7.30pm Berlin Time is a good time  ???
:P
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Gen.Hond{snp} on August 22, 2013, 08:36:29 AM
Attacking clan: 1.0
Defending clan: En'Ten
Planet: Yavin 4 Temple
1.0's side: TBD
Day/time: Sunday, 4:00 PM EST/ 10 Berlin PM

Attacking clan: 1.0
Defending clan: En'Ten
Planet: Bespin Cloud City
1.0's side: TBD
Day/time: Sunday, 5:00 PM EST / 11 Berlin PM

Sorry I didn't put in by Wednesday. Had some pc issues...
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: -=(212) Nixo=- on August 22, 2013, 10:11:12 AM
I was just tryin to spread them out ;) But if Saturday isn't as good then we can do all 3 Friday. 2 on each day is just better for us :)
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Carpe Diem Jumper on August 22, 2013, 12:17:33 PM
Ya, pls lets do all 3 Battles on Friday  :happy:
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Carpe Diem Jumper on August 22, 2013, 12:26:04 PM
Update Entenclan, ICW3 Week 3, Attacks & Defenses  :o

Friday_____________________________________

Attacking clan: Enten
Defending clan: 212
Planet: Tatooine: Mos Eisley
Proposed time/date: Friday, 06:00 PM Berlin time
Era/side: TBD
__________________________________________

Attacking clan: Enten
Defending clan: 212
Planet: Tatooine: Jabbas Palace
Proposed time/date: Friday, 08:00 PM Berlin time
Era/side: TBD
__________________________________________

Attacking clan: 212
Defending clan: Enten
Planet: Yavin, Arena
Proposed time/date: Friday, 09:00 PM Berlin Time
Era/side: TBD

Saturday___________________________________

Attacking clan: YAK
Defending clan: En'Ten
Planet: Rhen Var: Harbour
YAK's side: Rebels
Day/time: Saturday, 3:00 PM EST/ 09:00 PM Berlin Time
Era/side: TBD
__________________________________________

Attacking clan: YAK
Defending clan: En'Ten
Planet: Coruscant: Streets
YAK's side: TBD
Day/time: Saturday, 4:00 PM EST/ 10:00 PM Berlin Time
Era/side: TBD

Sunday____________________________________

Attacking clan: 1.0
Defending clan: En'Ten
Planet: Yavin 4 Temple
1.0's side: TBD
Day/time: Sunday, 4:00 PM EST/ 10 Berlin PM
__________________________________________

Attacking clan: 1.0
Defending clan: En'Ten
Planet: Bespin Cloud City
Day/time: Sunday, 5:00 PM EST / 11 Berlin PM
1.0's side: TBD
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Anyder on August 22, 2013, 04:17:55 PM
Quote from: Gen.Hond{snp} on August 22, 2013, 08:36:29 AM
Attacking clan: 1.0
Defending clan: En'Ten
Planet: Yavin 4 Temple
1.0's side: TBD
Day/time: Sunday, 4:00 PM EST/ 10 Berlin PM

Attacking clan: 1.0
Defending clan: En'Ten
Planet: Bespin Cloud City
1.0's side: TBD
Day/time: Sunday, 5:00 PM EST / 11 Berlin PM

Sorry I didn't put in by Wednesday. Had some pc issues...

We would like to move fw time.
Temple --> 3.00pm EST
CC --> 3.30pm EST (in case we're done with first one)
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Oven on August 22, 2013, 06:29:20 PM
Everybody has to read this carefully, especially #4

The OP has been updated with a schedule, please check for errors.

1. I need En'ten to decide if 1.0's proposed time changes on Temple and CC are acceptable.

2. The TBD stuff is getting old. Please give at least the era when you make the attack. And you should be telling the other team which side you are well in advance of the match, it's only fair.

3. Does 212 want Euro hosting on the Friday matches? Please tell me soon, and pick your side/era.

4. I can't admin any matches this weekend. Neither can Shazam. For real. I don't know about Scorpion or Deagle yet.

So here's what the rule is, for Week 3: If no admin is online at the time of a match, both clans have to suck it up and find someone to do the job. (It's usually a very easy job).

There are lots of options; I'll list a few:

Here's a list of what the "admin" does.


This doesn't mean that cheating or other funny business is allowed -- it's not. Any rule violations will be reported to me at the end of the day -- you can bet on it.

If you can't find anyone to be "admin", that's wrong. As long as the server isn't empty, someone can do the simple tasks listed above. By now you all know the drill!

If there's a serious disagreement about something before the match, that cannot be resolved, just play the match. We'll sort it out later. Be sure to document things with screenshots.

Here's a list of my choices for who should be admin, if you have to pick from the clans and if they are present:

1.0: Hond, Phantom
212: Nixo, Norris
Enten: Deagle, Jumper
YAK: Phobos, Sirpimped

If none of these people are at a match, pick from the others.

5. And remember, Deagle, Buckler, and I will have server hosting covered as usual.
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Phobos on August 22, 2013, 07:31:00 PM
Oh here is that post where I volunteered to help admin, I take that back.

I am not willing to help admin a tournament for some ungrateful head admin that is going to revoke my generosity to spite the fact I helped assemble the map pack for this failed tournament.

One who lets Anyder get away with cussing and crashing the tourney servers, but penalizes me for switching teams one time.

So not only do I withdraw my offer to help admin, but I ban Oven from ever asking me to admin or help set up mods or servers for any future tournaments which he organizes.

I'm willing to sub as admin if nobody else is online. This includes matches I don't play and matches I do play. Since I know the rules pretty well the only problem would be making sure people follow them at all times (harder to keep track of when you're not using freecam and only on one side). For example if I am playing as admin in a YAK battle and the other team starts premining while I count down, I would have no way of knowing unlike a neutral observing admin.

Also with no way to verify the namefakers who constantly switch tags (i.e. elmotech controller has used 1.0, 212, and wusi tags) in order to avoid being classified as a 'mercenary' this rule is pretty much useless and not enforceable unless you have verified the individual player IPs through the root server (access to which Led keeps very limited from what I understand).

That being said as long as players are willing to agree to follow the rules I will try to admin when needed. I won't have any way to 'ban the offender' though, so if players start getting too abusive I will film the offenses and then leave the server. I would just prefer not to admin if someone else such as Oven, Shazam or BlackScorpion is available.
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Gen.Hond{snp} on August 22, 2013, 08:06:37 PM
Yeah Sorry Oven to say the TBD for each. Last week we screwed up on it. Anyways heres what era/side we chose for the planets.

1.0's Eras/Sides
Cloud City: GCW Rebels
Temple: CW CIS.

Also about the admins I would be glad to do it but I do agree with Phobos that there are several problems such as name fakers, dealing with trouble makers, and enforcing other rules such as the Mercenary's since IP's wouldn't be available. It would be nice to see BlackScorpion do some since I haven't seen him admin yet that I know of. (Though he was at our fun Russia game as a Merc)

If you really really need an admin just xfire me and I would do it.
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Dark_Phantom on August 22, 2013, 08:55:39 PM
I'm a willing admin when I am online.  I can admin matches at various times this weekend.  I'll log on Xfire when available if anyone needs an admin.
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Carpe Diem Jumper on August 22, 2013, 10:55:34 PM
Quote from: Ashley Purdy on August 22, 2013, 04:17:55 PM
We would like to move fw time.
Temple --> 3.00pm EST
CC --> 3.30pm EST (in case we're done with first one)

Oh wtf Does it get any later :D
Guys, there are humans on this earth who have to work next Day!!!!!! :rant:
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: {PLA}gdh92 on August 23, 2013, 01:24:55 AM
If it's US server and an admin from Ovens list I can boot (I don't want to ban if I'm not there) if you let me know. If there's a serious disagreement between teams and it's OK with Oven I can admin the odd match.
I would rather not admin and just play but I'm willing to help out. Just give me some notice because I'll need to download, and learn to use, freecamera.
I think we'll manage fine without admins though we have good teams and good organiser/rules.  :cheers:
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Anyder on August 23, 2013, 01:33:49 AM
Quote from: Carpe Diem Jumper on August 22, 2013, 10:55:34 PM
Oh wtf Does it get any later :D
Guys, there are humans on this earth who have to work next Day!!!!!! :rant:

Plz honey, learn times lol. Ive put times earlier
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: -=(212) Nixo=- on August 23, 2013, 01:49:51 AM
Gcw/rebels for yavin and yes, euro hosted vs Enten.
Gcw/ empire for Mustafar.
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Carpe Diem Jumper on August 23, 2013, 02:47:10 AM
Quote from: Ashley Purdy on August 23, 2013, 01:33:49 AM
Plz honey, learn times lol. Ive put times earlier

Any ik, but 09:30pm Berlin Time is really late on Sunday.
The second fight ends surely 11 clock or later!  :dry:
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Anyder on August 23, 2013, 05:27:55 AM
Quote from: Carpe Diem Jumper on August 23, 2013, 02:47:10 AM
Any ik, but 09:30pm Berlin Time is really late on Sunday.
The second fight ends surely 11 clock or later!
Not sure..
Also i made u the favour of moving times earlier
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Oven on August 23, 2013, 06:35:38 AM
Sure gdh, you have my approval. But I agree, we'll be fine.

I've messaged Deagle about today's servers.

Have fun!
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: DEAGLE on August 23, 2013, 09:27:14 AM
enten takes mos

ggwp
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: -=(212) Nixo=- on August 23, 2013, 09:35:24 AM
Can we postpone the 2 remaining matches on Friday? Or at least one of them until saturday? I cannot connect to tunngle strongly enough to stop lagging out as shown on mos :/ I will still try to get players there anyway if they go ahead.
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Gen.Hond{snp} on August 23, 2013, 09:46:50 AM
Enten takes Mos Eisly. I admined it :D for giggles. It let Deagle play in the game instead of watching.

HEHE WOOPS THAT FILE FAILED xD

If you look at the picture you might be wondering why is it a 2v2. The game was a 3v3 at the beginning how ever Nixo's internet didn't like him so he constantly joined and left the server. So Originally it was Nixo, Ecko, and Ash. (They followed the 1/3 merc rule and for what ever reason Ecko has his name as a merc but hes not)
Since the server started later then normal due to Nixo's internet the count off was made when he was in it along with asking if both teams were ready. As the battle went Nixo was in and out and Enten having 3 members most of the time besides when Deagle switched with Jumper and a member of Enten named Siggi left right before the chance to take a screenshot of the 2v3 which looks like a 2v2 now. There were several instances of random people joining but none of them mattered in the end besides Deagle having to ban 1 of them.

In all it was a good game.

For a suggestion with 212 I suggest planning a better time? It seemed like they weren't as organized.
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: DEAGLE on August 23, 2013, 11:16:38 AM
212 defends jabba

ggwp
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Anyder on August 23, 2013, 11:47:03 AM
Quote from: DEAGLE on August 23, 2013, 09:27:14 AM
enten takes mos
Quote from: DEAGLE on August 23, 2013, 11:16:38 AM
212 defends jabba

212 Takes Arena
gg
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: RepComm on August 23, 2013, 12:41:14 PM
Quote from: Gen.Hond{snp} on August 23, 2013, 09:46:50 AM
Enten takes Mos Eisly. I admined it :D for giggles. It let Deagle play in the game instead of watching.

file:///C:/ProgramData/Xfire/screenshots/swbf-20130823-112437.png
Hond, That is a link to your computer memory, which none of us could view unless you were hosting your computer as an internet server or something crazy XD.
-Edit, and yeah, us 212 are hardly ever organized :P
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: -=(212) Nixo=- on August 23, 2013, 01:23:39 PM
Haha, the side would have helped if we were given it more in advance but yeah the time ended up not suiting us ad as Honda said this Internet hates me ;)
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Black Water on August 23, 2013, 07:02:30 PM
Did anyone take pictures of the end scores?
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: DEAGLE on August 24, 2013, 01:23:19 AM
Quote from: Ten Numb on August 23, 2013, 07:02:30 PM
Did anyone take pictures of the end scores?

I have them but what do you need them for? I don't see anyone disagreeing with the results.
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Anyder on August 24, 2013, 03:36:11 AM
212 Clan wants clanwar pics to have them in their website Gallery. Thats why he wants it.
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: {PLA}gdh92 on August 24, 2013, 12:18:08 PM
No one else has posted so I will:  YAK defended Mustafar. It was a fun game and both teams played well, apart bit of name calling from both sides of course. ;) GG
[spoiler](https://www.swbfgamers.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fscreenshot.xfire.com%2Fs%2F128741840-3.jpg&hash=d05085289fe1fbef7a6363e0e76ce53cffa2edea) In my defence I got that score after having 4-4-2 when my Tunngle crashed.[/spoiler]

Enten match is just starting but I think that there's only 2 enten compared to 15 YAK so I don't know what will happen.
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: WusiDavid on August 24, 2013, 12:35:00 PM
3 of us Yak's Merced for En'ten. ended up being 5v5. YAK dominated.
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Phobos on August 24, 2013, 12:36:56 PM
Quote from: WusiDavid on August 24, 2013, 12:35:00 PM
3 of us Yak's Merced for En'ten. ended up being 5v5. YAK dominated.
Enten left early but agreed to battle. They agreed to use 3 yak merc because they did not have the minimum number of required members present to avoid auto-forfeit. I think that number is 4 right oven? YAK won harbor.
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: WusiDavid on August 24, 2013, 12:39:56 PM
Was it 4v4? There were two Enten, did one of them leave?
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Phobos on August 24, 2013, 12:54:02 PM
Enten just said "we forfiet" and left the streets server. we will wait 10 more mins and if none return, then yak wins streets.
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Gen.Hond{snp} on August 24, 2013, 01:52:01 PM
Quote from: Phobos on August 24, 2013, 12:54:02 PM
Enten just said "we forfiet" and left the streets server. we will wait 10 more mins and if none return, then yak wins streets.

Depends what they meant by forfeit. If they meant the ICW3 wouldn't it be Native? (just streets because they agreed to harbor) This similarly happened to the planet Egypt with TcF. Telling they weren't going to play in the ICW3 during the time the battle was to happen. (Which is the same in this case)

If it was just the battle for streets then I don't see a problem of Yak having it. But we should find out what other Enten have to say about this before we can claim it Yak territory.
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: SirPimped on August 24, 2013, 02:18:30 PM
Quote from: Gen.Hond{snp} on August 24, 2013, 01:52:01 PM
Depends what they meant by forfeit. If they meant the ICW3 wouldn't it be Native? (just streets because they agreed to harbor) This similarly happened to the planet Egypt with TcF. Telling they weren't going to play in the ICW3 during the time the battle was to happen. (Which is the same in this case)

If it was just the battle for streets then I don't see a problem of Yak having it. But we should find out what other Enten have to say about this before we can claim it Yak territory.

They forfeit because they only had 1 player at streets and 2 at harbor. I don't think they are out of the tournament.
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Phobos on August 24, 2013, 02:31:54 PM
Quote from: Gen.Hond{snp} on August 24, 2013, 01:52:01 PM
Depends what they meant by forfeit. If they meant the ICW3 wouldn't it be Native? (just streets because they agreed to harbor) This similarly happened to the planet Egypt with TcF. Telling they weren't going to play in the ICW3 during the time the battle was to happen. (Which is the same in this case)

If it was just the battle for streets then I don't see a problem of Yak having it. But we should find out what other Enten have to say about this before we can claim it Yak territory.
yea they forfeited the map, although they were there 10 mins before it started to tell us in game. i dont recall them mentioning dropping out of the icw.
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Kishan on August 25, 2013, 06:10:41 AM
the enten guy said "enten forfeit.. yak takes streets"
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: DEAGLE on August 25, 2013, 07:17:55 AM
Unfortunately we were not enough players and yes indeed we forfeited the maps. Sorry Yak.
I'm pretty sure you get both planets now but I would wait for a statement from Oven just to be sure.
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: {PLA}gdh92 on August 25, 2013, 12:19:41 PM
I was asked to admin the 1.0 - Enten match at Temple, we waited 15 minutes and there was no Enten.
Plenty of 1.0 showed so I assume that's a forfeit for Enten but I'll leave that up to Oven. :)
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Anyder on August 25, 2013, 12:34:37 PM
Quote from: {PLA}gdh92 on August 25, 2013, 12:19:41 PM
I was asked to admin the 1.0 - Enten match at Temple, we waited 15 minutes and there was no Enten.
Plenty of 1.0 showed so I assume that's a forfeit for Enten but I'll leave that up to Oven. :)
Same with next map ---> Nobody came, so we get CC and Temple  ::)
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Gen.Hond{snp} on August 25, 2013, 01:09:03 PM
Well it would only make sense since YAK got their two planets from no Enten showing up. I think it would make sense since no Enten showed up for our 2 matches to give us the two planets.
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Oven on August 25, 2013, 03:19:09 PM
I will read all posts and messages tomorrow, probably in the AM, and post the week 4 thread.
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Phobos on August 25, 2013, 10:00:43 PM
Quote from: {PLA}gdh92 on October 12, 2013, 12:26:56 PM
Good games all, sorry we're short on YAK now. Thanks to all the YAKs who did come and those who helped out.
There's still one more game tomorrow, we need to have at least 1 planet at the end, we were winning at one point. :)
its not like YAK ever lost dabogah and since 212 lost on week 7 but got the map technically yak should get dagobah for losing on week 8

YAK defend dagobah and remains in the ICW despite the lies and desperate cheating joseph exhibits lol

Quote from: hellish hellbird on October 13, 2013, 07:03:09 PM
« Last Edit: October 12, 2013, 01:39:27 PM by Phobos »
that was yesterday you changed it
yeah modified post but YAK wasnt eliminiated since they kept CC :)

Quote from: Gen.Hond{snp} on August 25, 2013, 01:09:03 PM
Well it would only make sense since YAK got their two planets from no Enten showing up. I think it would make sense since no Enten showed up for our 2 matches to give us the two planets.
Thats not true Enten showed up to both battles Harbor and Streets. They fought harbor but left right before the end, and left before Streets started. Although I agree no-shows should also count as a forfiet.

Quote from: MartI don't think this post is complaining, more like defending so.. 1. No evidence, video or pic of a 2nd jet, even sha zam doesn't believe that a jet stole the tank, he thought you were lying, screenshot on my week 4 post, I don't believe you either, maybe you should lay off the we... nevermind!  2. If YAK or an admin felt that we had too many mercs, why didn't they tell us during the match or during countdown? We could have answered your worries about our team. 3. I've posted why we didn't overuse our limit already like 5 times... I'm tired. I give up, if this doesn't calm you I don't care anymore.
1. the evidence is of shazam statement saying he was killed by a jet after BS asked nico to stop. he recanted this statement after i showed him the exact spot where your another jet from your team stole the tank long after shazam was killed by a jet. maybe you should lay off all the lies
2. Because those mercs were using false clan tags for 212, members which at the time were not known to be mercs, thus 212 cheated again by knowingly letting 1.0 use false acting 212 tags without telling the admins about it. And now that the evidence is presented, you try to suppress it.
3. You overused the limit, since you only had 6 real 212 members, only 3 mercs could have been used max. Instead 7 mercs were used, and you lied about it in the match so as to prevent being caught cheating.
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: hellish hellbird on October 13, 2013, 05:32:50 PM
Quote from: Phobos on August 25, 2013, 10:00:43 PM
its not like YAK ever lost dabogah and since 212 lost on week 7 but got the map technically yak should get dagobah for losing on week 8

YAK defend dagobah and remains in the ICW despite the lies and desperate cheating joseph exhibits lol
Thats not true Enten showed up to both battles Harbor and Streets. They fought harbor but left right before the end, and left before Streets started. Although I agree no-shows should also count as a forfiet.
1. the evidence is of shazam statement saying he was killed by a jet after BS asked nico to stop. he recanted this statement after i showed him the exact spot where your another jet from your team stole the tank long after shazam was killed by a jet. maybe you should lay off all the lies
2. Because those mercs were using false clan tags for 212, members which at the time were not known to be mercs, thus 212 cheated again by knowingly letting 1.0 use false acting 212 tags without telling the admins about it. And now that the evidence is presented, you try to suppress it.
3. You overused the limit, since you only had 6 real 212 members, only 3 mercs could have been used max. Instead 7 mercs were used, and you lied about it in the match so as to prevent being caught cheating.

give it up already 212 won this week
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: Phobos on October 13, 2013, 06:57:54 PM
Quote from: hellish hellbird on October 13, 2013, 05:32:50 PM
give it up already 212 won this week
give up quoting posts from 2 months ago they already resigned before this week
Title: Re: ICW3 Week 3
Post by: hellish hellbird on October 13, 2013, 07:03:09 PM
« Last Edit: October 12, 2013, 01:39:27 PM by Phobos »
that was yesterday you changed it
EhPortal 1.34 © 2024, WebDev