Noted.
Edit: Fixed!
Edit: Fixed!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts Menu----------------------------------------
System.Drawing
Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.18408 built by: FX451RTMGREL
CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Drawing/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Drawing.dll
----------------------------------------
System
Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.18408 built by: FX451RTMGREL
CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.dll
----------------------------------------
System.Xml
Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.18408 built by: FX451RTMGREL
CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Xml/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Xml.dll
----------------------------------------
************** JIT Debugging **************
To enable just-in-time (JIT) debugging, the .config file for this
application or computer (machine.config) must have the
jitDebugging value set in the system.windows.forms section.
The application must also be compiled with debugging
enabled.
For example:
<configuration>
<system.windows.forms jitDebugging="true" />
</configuration>
When JIT debugging is enabled, any unhandled exception
will be sent to the JIT debugger registered on the computer
rather than be handled by this dialog box.
I think I got the whole thing, any ideas on a fix for this? Any help would be appreciated.
Quote from: Syyy on July 16, 2014, 02:29:11 PMI think he means that no date and time have been set.
Maybe you didn't see their posts, but Dark_Phantom and Shazam actually have posted the attacks for BOB and YAK respectively.
Quote from: aeria. on July 14, 2014, 08:28:52 PMYour absolutely right in saying that this is now in the wrong topic, I wasn't sure where should put it, however; the original purpose of this has been destroyed so I think it is time to end this discussion.
Oh come on be real. This is a SWBF related topic. Patriot posted it here instead of the SWBF forum so that it'll get more attention. I used to do the same thing back in the day.
"Hey look let me ride on these bunch of dudes to get free internet points."
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Quote from: aeria. on July 14, 2014, 10:50:28 PMWhat does a moo emote have to do with this?
At least Phobos makes sense here instead of trying to circlejerk.
I can't believe that moo emote is still available after all these years.
Quote from: CommanderAwesome on July 15, 2014, 08:34:36 AMInteresting ideas CommanderAwesome. Thank you all for your comments, as I stated at the beginning of this post, I ask that this discussion be closed, as no good is coming from it.
Sure, it would be awesome to see, say, the KotOR era on the frostbite 3 engine, but it probably won't happen. But at least we can try to make something as close as possible in SWBF1 or 2, or maybe our unity game.
Quote from: aeria. on July 14, 2014, 05:55:04 PMaeria. if you don't care about battlefront why are you here? You are not helping the community you are not adding anything to the site. If you don't care about this game then go enjoy your other games!
I've said this many times before and I have no qualms about people's feelings being hurt over it:
You guys should move to better, less outdated games. I'm just sick of walls of text of people trying to justify playing SWBF1 in this day and age. The game will never die... it just exponentially decays in numbers.
If anyone here has CS:GO hit me up on steam. That's a much better game.
:3
Page created in 0.087 seconds with 17 queries.