Post #1. Courtesy of Phantom. I know that this will be rebutted very quickly, but someone needs to start this off.
Quote straight from post on thread that 1.0 on Russia did not have too many mercenaries because our mercenaries were former members who declared membership with 1.0 for the remainder of ICW3 (if Oven declares it legal to do so). Kamino was not disputed, 1.0 victory. Eddie's Kastel will be explained by Hond, YAK won the actual battle, but there was a dispute on a glitch (the map is full of them). 212 is not my issue in this post. Harbor is disputed with mercs now because of the list above and other things.
My opinion on the matter: if we would have known maps would have turned into a recon fest, we would have stopped it most likely. As it stands, the recommendations were taken for sides, and recons were not even mentioned, so I believe it shouldn't be changed. If there is a recon spam fest, then it's the players' responsibility to turn it into something else.
In regards to the mission.lvl mod, if it is determined to be needed, I can make a new one. But seriously, how hard is it to NOT spawn as a Jet. If you do, leave and rejoin. Not that hard.
Also, if someone dies, just 1 person die on the other team. And some of us are irritated that battles are starting half an hour late because 1 person will not show up. Declare everyone, if someone is late, say they will be coming and add them to the official count.
QuoteI believe Majesty should be banned from the ICW3 for blatantly disobeying rules which he/she was clearly warned about many times in servers, repeatedly saying "idc" or something like that, and continuing. Poor sportsmanship is not on my list of top things to endorse.
The issue currently in question is whether clans that were previously in ICW3 are allowed to join other clans. The players that were listed as mercs, most of them had their clans knocked out. If those players are allowed to join other clans, then the merc rule was followed. If not, then the battle at Russia was lost.
Members under question:
(Phobos Post)
- Killfire - merc
- Erweitert - A UEF who joined 1.0
- Anyder - A UEF who joined 1.0
- Wusi Wild - A WUSI, most WUSI members left joined 1.0 for ICW
- Nico - Nico is a member, confirmed
- Troy - A WUSI, joined 1.0
- 212 Dirty harry - merc
- FrenchFryZ - merc
- Better Off Dead - A WUSI, joined 1.0
- Engel - umm we really aren't sure how this one works. Says not aligned with any clan, yet no merc tag
Also, most EnTen members joined 1.0 for remainder of ICW3 (Jumper, Deagle, etc.)
Quote straight from post on thread that 1.0 on Russia did not have too many mercenaries because our mercenaries were former members who declared membership with 1.0 for the remainder of ICW3 (if Oven declares it legal to do so). Kamino was not disputed, 1.0 victory. Eddie's Kastel will be explained by Hond, YAK won the actual battle, but there was a dispute on a glitch (the map is full of them). 212 is not my issue in this post. Harbor is disputed with mercs now because of the list above and other things.
My opinion on the matter: if we would have known maps would have turned into a recon fest, we would have stopped it most likely. As it stands, the recommendations were taken for sides, and recons were not even mentioned, so I believe it shouldn't be changed. If there is a recon spam fest, then it's the players' responsibility to turn it into something else.
In regards to the mission.lvl mod, if it is determined to be needed, I can make a new one. But seriously, how hard is it to NOT spawn as a Jet. If you do, leave and rejoin. Not that hard.
Also, if someone dies, just 1 person die on the other team. And some of us are irritated that battles are starting half an hour late because 1 person will not show up. Declare everyone, if someone is late, say they will be coming and add them to the official count.
QuoteQuote from: Shazam
Recons will be disabled for Russia, and there will be a server-sided mission.lvl mod preventing anyone from spawning as a special unit.
Enough of this, guys. There will be a rematch next week on Harbor and Russia. End of discussion.
It seems to me this is a little out of line. Asserting oneself is understandable, and in this case is probably needed, but declaring an end to discussion with a decision by one person that will severely impact the rest of the participants of the ICW3 is not looked upon highly by me. I understand Shazam was appointed 2nd in command, but when the dispute resolution directly benefits the clan that he is a part of that lost both battles, then I am leery, as I know many players are. We wanted to wait for Oven's decision, as this is his tournament, and deserves respect for organizing this.
P.S. I wish to commend UNIT 33 for locking the thread before we hit 30 pages. This just ended up being ridiculous. I hope I stated my position well and stated everything I wished to address. Thank you for reading. Have a nice day!
[/spoiler]
[/spoiler][/spoiler][/spoiler]